Abstract:Over the last forty years, China has experienced extraordinary growth under output market reforms, but the growth rates are now tapering off. Reforms in factor markets and city governance have been much slower and are viewed as having the potential to yield considerable efficiency gains. In this paper, we explore this possibility, tackling the key issues of local political manipulation of land markets and objectives of local leaders, constraints on the local budgetary process to finance infrastructure and capital market favoritism of certain cities. We use a structural general equilibrium model with trade and migration frictions, based on prefecture level data. We model the political process of land misallocation within cities which drives up housing prices and estimate city-by-city local leaders’ preferences over economic performance versus residents’ welfare. Counterfactual analysis shows that equalizing capital prices across cities, changing the political scorecard for city leaders to reward just maximization of local consumer welfare, and relaxing local budget constraints together increase welfare of consumers and returns to capital by 13.7% and 2.25% respectively. Housing prices would decline in almost all cities; and the reforms would reduce the current excessive, often showcase investment in local public infrastructure by 49% nationally. These reforms would significantly reduce the population of favored cities with low capital costs like Tianjin and Beijing and raise the population of cities with high costs of capital and low local-leader weights on consumer welfare like Shenzhen and Dongguan.

Markets Price Politicians: Evidence from China’s Municipal Bond Markets

Overpricing in Municipal Bond Markets and the Unintended Consequences of Regulatory Measures: Evidence from China

Marketization Vs. Market Chase: Insights from Implicit Government Guarantees

The financial value of the within-government political network: Evidence from Chinese municipal corporate bonds

School District, Education Quality, and Housing Price: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Hangzhou, China

Local Political-Turnover-Induced Uncertainty and Bond Market Pricing

Does credit rating agency reputation matter in China's local government bond market?

Political manipulation of urban land markets: Evidence from China

Local officials’ promotion incentives and issuance of urban investment bonds

Will Political Connections Be Accounted for in the Interest Rates of Chinese Urban Development Investment Bonds?

Not All Bonds Are Created Equal-As Benchmarks for Corporate Bonds

The Impact of Chinese New Budget Law on the Issuance cost of Urban Investment Bonds

Monetary policy, differences among issuing agencies, and the pricing of local government bonds

A Micro View On Public Land Granting, Land Price And Housing Price: A Hangzhou Study

The Great Wall of Debt: Real Estate, Political Risk, and Chinese Local Government Financing Cost

The Demand Effect of Yield-Chasing Retail Investors: Evidence from the Chinese Enterprise Bond Market

An analysis of the factors influencing the issuing rate of local government bonds in China: Based on the VAR model

Pledgeability and Asset Prices: Evidence from the Chinese Corporate Bond Markets

Corporate Bond Ratings, Underwriters’ Reputation and Cost of Bonds

WITHDRAWN: Bond market reform and investors' risk awareness: Evidence from the issuing pricing of corporate bonds in China

Determinants of the Urban Investment Bonds in China