Abstract:One‐dimensional site response analysis (1D SRA) remains the standard practice in considering the effect of local soil deposits and predicting site‐specific ground motions, although its range of applicability to realistic seismic wavefields is still in question. In this 1D approach, horizontal and vertical ground shaking are assumed to be induced by vertically propagating shear and compressional waves, respectively. A recent study based on analytical two‐dimensional (2D) plane waves and simple point source earthquake simulations has shown two mechanistic limitations in this 1D modelling technique for general inclined seismic waves, that is, systematic over‐prediction of the vertical motion and wave trapping in the 1D soil column. In this article, we evaluate in detail the applicability of this 1D modelling approach to realistic three‐dimensional (3D) simulated seismic wavefields in shallow sedimentary basins. Linear‐viscoelastic 1D SRA predictions using two types of input motions that are commonly used in practice—rock outcrop and in‐column motions, are compared with the reference true site response results from 3D earthquake simulations in terms of various measures in the frequency and time domain. It is shown that the horizontal motion in the 3D seismic wavefield exhibits dominant shear wave propagation phenomenon, while the vertical motion is a combined effect of compressional and shear waves and can be over‐predicted by the 1D approach when the incident seismic waves are inclined. Direct evidence of the wave refraction process that leads to the vertical motion over‐prediction is provided. 1D SRA with in‐column inputs can yield motions that have significantly longer duration compared to the true 3D site response solution due to trapped waves, casting in doubt the frequent need for increased soil damping in existing site studies to compensate for wave attenuation due to scattering alone. Sensitivity investigation on the increase of soil profile damping by a multiplier Dmul shows Dmul values compatible with those found in the literature for both horizontal and vertical motions. It is shown that the level of Dmul optimized for a best match of the spectral acceleration is dependent on the characteristic of the input motion and a larger Dmul is typically required for the vertical component. In contrast, 1D SRA with outcrop motions predicts motions with shorter significant duration due to its inability to capture the basin‐edge generated surface waves. A suite of ground motion simulations was performed to assess the sensitivity of the observations to the basin geologic structure including the velocity gradient, rock‐basin impedance contrast and basin depth. The analysis results show that the accuracy of the simplified 1D procedure is dependent on the wavefield composition of both the input motions and the true 3D site response solution. While the horizontal motions in shallow sedimentary basins can, to the first order, be reasonably captured by the simplified 1D approach, 1D SRA for the vertical component is in general not reliable and contributions from inclined shear waves should be accounted for in site‐specific evaluation of the vertical design ground motion.

Direction-dependent analysis of parameters for stochastic synthesis of vertical ground motion

Improvement of Stochastic Green's Function Method for 3D Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation

Stochastic Green’s Function Method Considering Non-Uniform Rise Time Distribution to Simulate 3D Broadband Ground Motion

Ground-motion Simulation Using Stochastic Finite-Fault Method Combined with a Parameter Calibration Process Based on Historical Seismic Data

Improvement of Source Spectrum Fall‐Off for Simulating Ground Motion Using Stochastic Green’s Function Method

Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Stability of a Rock Slope by Combining the Simulation of Stochastic Ground Motion with Permanent Displacement Analysis

Parameter estimation for predicting near-fault strong ground motion and its application to Lushan earthquake in China

Applicability of 1D site response analysis to shallow sedimentary basins: A critical evaluation through physics‐based 3D ground motion simulations

Generation of synthetic spectrum-compatible bi-directional ground motions with specific directionality

Stochastic Simulation of Spatially Distributed Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packets and Kriging Analysis

Evaluation of directionality in physics-based ground motion simulations of strike-slip earthquakes

Stochastic Simulation of Regionalized Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packets and Cokriging Analysis

Improvement of Source Spectrum Fall‐Off for Simulating Ground Motion Using Stochastic Green's Function Method

A stochastic approach for the generation and combination of vertical and horizontal strong ground motion

Probabilistic investigation of the seismic displacement of earth slopes under stochastic ground motion: A rotational sliding block analysis

Wavelet-Based Stochastic Model for Jointly Simulating Three-Component Ground Motions

Source Scaling, Spatially Variable Path Attenuation, and Site‐Effect Parameters via a Generalized Inversion Technique for Strong‐Motion Data from Sichuan, China

Calibration of a Semi-Stochastic Procedure for Simulating High-Frequency Ground Motions

Quantifying the Effect of Ground-Motion Nonstationarity on the Nonlinear Dynamic Responses of an Ultra-High Arch Dam

Site-specific stochastic ground motion model utilizing deterministic physics-informed simulations: A Bayesian approach

An Empirical Spatiotemporal Input Model for Regional Seismic Ground Motions