Deep Learning Assisted Burn Wound Diagnosis (Preprint)

Che Wei Chang,Feipei Lai,Mesakh Christian,Yu Chun Chen,Ching Hsu,Yo Shen Chen,Dun Hao Chang,Tyng Luen Roan,Yen Che Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.22798

2020-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of the percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) of burn wounds is crucial in the management of burn patients. The resuscitation fluid and nutritional needs of burn patients, their need for intensive unit care, and probability of mortality are all directly related to %TBSA. It is difficult to estimate a burn area of irregular shape by inspection. Many articles have reported discrepancy in estimating %TBSA by different doctors. OBJECTIVE We propose a method, based on deep learning, for burn wound detection, segmentation and calculation of % TBSA on a pixel-to-pixel basis. METHODS A two-step procedure was used to convert burn wound diagnosis into %TBSA. In the first step, images of burn wounds were collected and labeled by burn surgeons and the dataset was then input into two deep learning architectures, U-Net and Mask R-CNN, each configured with two different backbones, to segment the burn wounds. In the second step, we collected and labeled images of hands to create another dataset, which was also input into U-Net and Mask R-CNN to segment the hands. The percentage of TBSA of the burn wounds was then calculated by comparing the pixels of mask areas on the images of the burn wound and hand of the same patient according to the rule of hand, which says that one’s hand accounts for 0.8% of TBSA. RESULTS A total of 2591 images of burn wounds were collected and labeled to form the burn-wound dataset. The dataset was randomly split into a ratio of 8:1:1 to form the training, validation, and testing sets. Four hundred images of volar hands were collected and labeled to form the hand dataset, which was also split into three sets using the same method. For the images of burn wounds, Mask R-CNN with ResNet101 had the best segmentation result with a Dice coefficient (DC) of 0.9496, while U-Net with ResNet101 had a DC of 0.8545. For the hand images, U-Net and Mask R-CNN had similar performance with a DC of 0.9920 and 0.9910, respectively. Lastly, we conducted a test diagnosis in a burn patient. Mask R-CNN with ResNet-101 had on average less deviation (0.115% TBSA) from the ground truth than burn surgeons. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the first studies to diagnose all depths of burn wounds and convert the segmentation results into %TBSA using different deep learning models. We aimed to assist medical staff in estimating burn size more accurately and thereby helping to provide precise care to burn victims.