Abstract:Logical reasoning consistently plays a fundamental and significant role in the domains of knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as a noteworthy innovation in natural language processing (NLP). However, the question of whether LLMs can effectively address the task of logical reasoning, which requires gradual cognitive inference similar to human intelligence, remains unanswered. To this end, we aim to bridge this gap and provide comprehensive evaluations in this paper. Firstly, to offer systematic evaluations, we select fifteen typical logical reasoning datasets and organize them into deductive, inductive, abductive and mixed-form reasoning settings. Considering the comprehensiveness of evaluations, we include 3 early-era representative LLMs and 4 trending LLMs. Secondly, different from previous evaluations relying only on simple metrics (e.g., \emph{accuracy}), we propose fine-level evaluations in objective and subjective manners, covering both answers and explanations, including \emph{answer correctness}, \emph{explain correctness}, \emph{explain completeness} and \emph{explain redundancy}. Additionally, to uncover the logical flaws of LLMs, problematic cases will be attributed to five error types from two dimensions, i.e., \emph{evidence selection process} and \emph{reasoning process}. Thirdly, to avoid the influences of knowledge bias and concentrate purely on benchmarking the logical reasoning capability of LLMs, we propose a new dataset with neutral content. Based on the in-depth evaluations, this paper finally forms a general evaluation scheme of logical reasoning capability from six dimensions (i.e., \emph{Correct}, \emph{Rigorous}, \emph{Self-aware}, \emph{Active}, \emph{Oriented} and \emph{No hallucination}). It reflects the pros and cons of LLMs and gives guiding directions for future works.

A Generative-Symbolic Model for Logical Reasoning in NLU

Improved Logical Reasoning of Language Models via Differentiable Symbolic Programming

Weakly Supervised Reasoning by Neuro-Symbolic Approaches

Can Large Language Models Act as Symbolic Reasoners?

Meta-Reasoning: Semantics-Symbol Deconstruction for Large Language Models

Large Language Models Are In-Context Semantic Reasoners Rather Than Symbolic Reasoners

A Simple Generative Model of Logical Reasoning and Statistical Learning

Are Large Language Models Really Good Logical Reasoners? A Comprehensive Evaluation and Beyond

Enhancing Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models through Logic

A Symbolic-Neural Reasoning Model for Visual Question Answering

Neuro-symbolic Training for Reasoning over Spatial Language

A Systematic Analysis of Large Language Models as Soft Reasoners: The Case of Syllogistic Inferences

Language Models Can Be Logical Solvers

Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning

Leap-Of-Thought: Teaching Pre-Trained Models to Systematically Reason Over Implicit Knowledge

Reliable Reasoning Beyond Natural Language

Neural Logic Reasoning

Leveraging LLMs for Hypothetical Deduction in Logical Inference: A Neuro-Symbolic Approach

Enhancing Ethical Explanations of Large Language Models through Iterative Symbolic Refinement

Large Language Models Are Neurosymbolic Reasoners

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge