Abstract:This study identifies trends in disaster science research as well as knowledge gaps at a broad scale in order to help underpin and inform future research in the area. A numerical analysis of 58,106 peer-reviewed articles over four decades reveals key research themes and clusters, their temporal variation of activity as well as the influential studies that have played a key role in their development. Results indicate that what we recognize as contemporary disaster science has only shown discernible patterns of activity and knowledge foundation formation since the 1990s. Disaster research currently constitutes approximately 0.23% of all academic papers published per year. The initial and intermediate phases of the development of the field have been unsystematic and fragmented, with the focus of the field fluctuating for almost two decades until recently when research clusters have shown signs of stabilizing. It is observable that, over the last few years, more attention has been allocated to mitigation, response and recovery by focusing on issues such as the psychological impacts of disasters, reducing exposure to disasters and building community resilience to cope and recover from disasters. This is in contrast with earlier years where the focus was predominantly on preparedness and prevention. Research in different countries has been highly correlated with the types of disasters that occur in their regions, highlighting the relevance of the local situatedness and context in disaster research. The recent emergence and explosive growth of a research cluster linked to flood detection, flood mapping and flood hazard assessment is particularly notable, marking the sharpest growth of a single research cluster ever recorded in this field. A similar trend, though of a smaller magnitude, is observable in relation to research on wildfire hazard. Overall, flood-related research has proven one of the dominant themes, with multiple clusters detectable on the topic, each with their own distinguishable knowledge foundation (i.e., set of references). The pattern of collaboration among disaster researchers is shifting from predominantly domestic research towards international collaborations (currently reaching about 1/3 of all disaster-related papers each year), a sign of recognition to the value of cross-cultural and interdisciplinary perspectives in disaster research.

Present and Future Resilience Research Driven by Science and Technology

A Systematic Review on Power System Resilience from the Perspective of Generation, Network, and Load

Attributes, Challenges and Future Directions of Community Resilience

Resilience of critical structures, infrastructures and communities

State of the research in community resilience: progress and challenges

Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters

A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Global Community Resilience Research

Resilience and Safety of Civil Engineering Systems and Communities: A Bibliometric Analysis for Mapping the State-of-the-art

The State of Art of Community Resilience of Physical Infrastructures

Disaster Risk Science: A Geographical Perspective and a Research Framework

State of the research on disaster risk management of interdependent infrastructure systems for community resilience planning

Resilience of Cyber-Physical Systems: Role of AI, Digital Twins, and Edge Computing

Research advance in disaster resilience:a literature survey-based analysis

Research Agenda in Intelligent Infrastructure to Enhance Disaster Management, Community Resilience and Public Safety

Resilient City: Characterization, Challenges and Outlooks

A Scientometric Review of Urban Disaster Resilience Research

The development of resilience research in critical infrastructure systems: A bibliometric perspective

Progress and landscape of disaster science: Insights from computational analyses

A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities