Possible Prognostic Function of MALAT1 in Cancer Patients v1

Chengdi Wang,Junxin Cheng,Xiao Ji,Ya Li,Wen Zhang,Yushun Yan,Yizhang Zhu,Linfei Wei,Keer Huang,Xiaomin He,Hao Sui,Weimin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.vkre4v6
2018-01-01
Abstract:Background: With incidence of all types of cancers on the rise, cancer is now the leading cause of death worldwide.1Previous studies2, 3 have stressed the significant role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the diagnostic efficacy of cancer, onset and development. Method: A meta-analysis was implemented aiming to explore whether lncRNA, Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT-1), can work as a promising biomarker for prognosis in human cancers. Eligible articles were collected from multiple online databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, CNKI, Web of Science and Google Scholar) and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between the expression levels of MALAT-1 and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) and clinicopathological parameters which may have an impact on the pooled results. A total of 1389 patients from 13 studies were included in our meta-analysis, whose survival analysis was all univariate. Result: The results of our meta-analysis indicated that overexpression of MALAT-1 was significantly correlated with worse OS in cancer patients (HR = 1.941, 95% CI: 1.168-2.715, P<0.001) as well as worse DFS (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.34-3.06, P < 0.001) and worse RFS (HR=1.90, 95% CI: 0.68-3.13, P < 0.001) in cancer patients in general. Due to heterogeneity may present in the overall results, subgroup analyses based on cancer type, cut-off value, patient size and median age were also performed in our study. In subgroups analysis, we found that the HR of group urinary system and group median age < 55 is particularly high compared with group OS (overall data). Conclusion: To sum up, our meta-analysis results implied that increased expression level of MALAT-1 was positively associated with unfavorable prognostic results in many types of cancer patients. Besides, younger patients and patients with urinary tumors appear to be of poorer prognosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?