Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

6. The Paradox of Informality and Formality: China’s Suburban Land Development and Planning

Financing China'S Suburbanization: Capital Accumulation Through Suburban Land Development In Hangzhou

URBAN-RURAL SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE DUAL ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEM OF CONSTRUCTION LAND: A CASE STUDY OF GUANGZHOU

Planning for Social Inclusion: the Impact of Socioeconomic Inequities on the Informal Development of Farmland in Suburban Beijing

Suburban Development and Governance in China

Suburban Residential Development in the Era of Market-Oriented Land Reform: the Case of Hangzhou, China

The Role of Villages and Townships in Informal Land Development in China: An Investigation on the City Fringe of Beijing

Informal Suburbanization in Beijing: an Investigation of Informal Gated Communities on the Urban Fringe

Suburban Industrial Land Development in Transitional China: Spatial Restructuring and Determinants

Informality and the Development and Demolition of Urban Villages in the Chinese Peri-urban Area

State-led land requisition and transformation of rural villages in transitional China

The Dilemma of Land Expansion and Governance in Rural China: A Comparative Study Based on Three Townships in Zhejiang Province

Dual-track Urbanization Under the Dual Land Ownership System

The Analysis on the Informal Development and Governance in Urban Fringe

China's Rapid Urbanization: Capitalist Logic and the Way Forward

Cities without slums? China's land regime and dual-track urbanization

Rural spatial transformation and governance from the perspective of land development rights: A case study of Fenghe village in Guangzhou

China′s Emerging Suburbanization under the Background of Neoliberalism

China ’ s Urbanisation from Below : Village Led Land and Property Development

The Suburban Land Question

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution