Abstract:Multimodal urban transportation systems exhibit complex inter actions between components, including users, multimodal transportation facilities, supply side agencies, and operators. Although these interactions are obvious, rigorous quantitative methods for optimizing control variables across modes of transportation on real-world networks are deficient. A social welfare maximization model was established for joint optimization of bus fare, rail transit fare, and congestion tolls for private cars. The authors determined the optimality conditions and the second-order partial derivatives for this optimization problem. Because of the complexity of the multimodal urban transportation system, the objective function of social welfare has no closed form and is extremely expensive to evaluate. The authors therefore proposed a simulation-based framework for evaluation of the objective function and optimization of three decision variables across multiple travel modes. Several metamodels (i.e., mathematical functions that approximate the true shape of an unknown, nonlinear, and complex objective function) were adopted to approximate the highly nonlinear input–output mappings in the urban system. This is the first study to develop a simulation-based method for joint optimization of transit and road network operations. The case study applied the simulation-based optimization framework to the Sino–Singapore ecocity in Tianjin, China, by using VISSUM as the urban systems simulator. An “ecocity” is defined by the authors as “a thriving city that is socially harmonious, environmentally friendly, resource-efficient, and a model for sustainable development.” Results show that metamodels can accurately approximate the real objective function and produce good suboptimal and near-optimal solutions. The optimal combination of transit fares and congestion tolls significantly outperform those under two baseline scenarios. The optimal solutions also suggest that extreme transit fares (too high or too low) or congestion tolls are contrary to welfare-maximizing objectives. The proposed method can be applied for joint optimization of other multimodal planning and operational strategies, such as investment and operational decisions across various modes of transportation.

An Optimal Transit Fare and Frequency Design Model with Equity Impact Constraints

Social Welfare Maximization of Multimodal Transportation

A Bi-Level Optimization Model for Ride-Sourcing Platform’s Spatial Pricing Strategy

Optimizing a desirable fare structure for a bus-subway corridor

Optimal Fare Structure for Transit Networks with Elastic Demand

Evaluation and Optimization of Public Transport Subsidies for Alternative Energy

A Bi‐level Programming Approach — Optimal Transit Fare under Line Capacity Constraints

Optimizing Transit Network Departure Frequency considering Congestion Effects

OPTIMAL FARE DESIGN FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORKS WITH ELASTIC DEMAND

Policy-Combination Oriented Optimization for Public Transportation Based on the Game Theory

Integrated Planning of Park-and-ride Facilities and Transit Service

Optimal Routing Design of Feeder Transit With Stop Selection Using Aggregated Cell Phone Data and Open Source GIS Tool

Second-best congestion pricing models for multiple time periods and multiple travelers

Integrated optimization of train route plan and timetable with dynamic demand for the urban rail transit line

Bus timetable optimization model in response to the diverse and uncertain requirements of passengers for travel comfort

Probing into the application of Train ticket fare distribution optimization model

Ticket Fare Optimization for China’s High-Speed Railway Based on Passenger Choice Behavior

Transit Planning Optimization Under Ride-Hailing Competition and Traffic Congestion

Pricing of Responsive Feeder Transit Considering Competitive Relationships With Bike Sharing

Integrated optimization of train stop planning and ticket pricing with equity concerns of passengers for high-speed railways

Optimal Fare-Pricing for Urban Rapid-Transport Line Project and Government Compensation