The diagnostic ability of circulatory measurements from OCTA for glaucoma compared with structural measurements from OCT: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Qingyao Ning,Jing Cao,Lixia Lou,Kai Jin,Zhifang Liu,Xizhe Dai,Juan Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.9855/v1
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background OCTA was a new non-invasive technique to detect blood perfusion in several layers of retina. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic advantages of OCTA circulatory parameters comparing with OCT structural parameters, and the diagnostic ability of the parameters between patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and intraocular pressure (IOP)>21 mmHg. Methods Four databases were searched (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE) for articles published up to Dec 2018. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of OCTA and OCT parameters were used to perform the meta-analysis using Stata 15.0. The quality of included studies was accessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Nine studies were selected from initial 1491 articles, involving 886 patients and more than 1149 eyes. Whole enface image vessel density (wiVD) (disc scan), ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) showed the best AUROC, which was 0.93, 0.94 and 0.92. Then followed by peripapillary VD (0.84), inside disc VD (0.84), wiVD (macular scan) (0.70), and parafoveal VD (0.65). Subgroup analysis showed AUROC of GCC and inside disc VD was 0.97 and 0.93 in the group with NTG, 0.92 and 0.77 in the group with IOP>21 mmHg. Conclusion Structural parameters (RNFL and GCC) are well-behaved in diagnosing all types glaucoma. WiVD (disc scan) represents good diagnostic accuracy of glaucoma comparable to structural parameters. Inside disc VD performed strong diagnostic ability for NTG patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?