Soil respiration and its Q 10 response to various 2 grazing systems of a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia , 3 China 4 5

Cheng Nie,Yu’e Li,Lei Niu,Yinghui Liu,Rui Shao,Xia Xu,Yuqiang Tian
2019-01-01
Abstract:16 Background: As one of the important management practices of grassland ecosystems, grazing 17 has fundamental effects on soil properties, vegetation and soil microbes. Grazing can thus alter 18 soil respiration and the soil carbon cycle, yet its impacts and mechanisms remain unclear. 19 Methods: To explore the response of soil carbon flux and temperature sensitivity to different 20 grazing systems, soil respiration (Rs), soil temperature (ST) and soil moisture (SM) were 21 observed from December 2014 to September 2015 in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia under 22 three grazing systems: yearlong grazing, rest-rotation grazing and grazing exclusion. In addition, 23 plant aboveground and root biomass, soil microbial biomass and community composition, and 24 soil nutrients were measured during the pilot period. 25 Results: Rs was significantly different among the three grazing systems. The average Rs was 26 highest under rest-rotation grazing (1.26 μmol·m·s), followed by grazing exclusion (0.98 27 μmol·m·s) and year-long grazing (0.94 μmol·m·s). Rs was closely associated with ST, SM, 28 potential substrate and root and soil microbe activity. The effects of grazing among two grazing 29 systems had generality, but were different due to grazing intensity. The root biomass was 30 stimulated by grazing, and the rest-rotation grazing system resulted in the highest Rs. Grazing led 31 to decreases in aboveground and microbial biomass as well as the loss of soil total nitrogen and 32 total phosphorus from the steppe ecosystem, which explained the negative effect of grazing on Rs 33 in the yearlong grazing system than incompared to the grazing exclusion system. The temperature 34 sensitivity of Rs (Q10) was higher in the rest-rotation and year-long grazing systems, likely due to 35 the higher temperature sensitivity of rhizosphere respiration and higher ‘rhizosphere priming 36 effect’ in the promoted root biomass. The structural equation model analysis showed that while 37 grazing inhibited Rs by reducing soil aeration porosity, ground biomass and soil moisture, it 38 increased Q10 but had a lower effect than other factors. A better understanding of the effects of 39 grazing on soil respiration has important practical implications. 40
What problem does this paper attempt to address?