Department of earth and atmospheric sciences

Yangkang Chen,Yu Zhang,Hua-Wei Zhou

2005-01-01

Abstract:Common-midpoint (CMP) stacking technique plays an important role in enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in seismic data processing and imaging. Weighted stacking is often used to improve the performance of conventional equalweight stacking in further attenuating random noise and handling the amplitude variations in real seismic data. In this study, we propose to use a hybrid framework of combining AB semblance and local-similarity-weighted stacking scheme. The objective is to achieve an optimal stacking of the CMP gathers with class II amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) polarity-reversal anomaly. The selection of high-quality near-offset reference trace is another innovation of this work because of its better preservation of useful energy. Applications to synthetic and field seismic data demonstrate a great improvement using our method to capture the true locations of weak reflections, distinguish thin-bed tuning artifacts, and effectively attenuate random noise. INTRODUCTION Semblance spectrum A velocity spectrum or semblance spectrum is often used to estimate normal-moveout (NMO) velocity. The concept of velocity spectrum or semblance was initially introduced as a measure of the correlation of multichannel seismic data (Taner and Koehler, 1969; Neidell and Taner, 1971). Nowadays, semblance-based NMO velocity analysis is still popular and is the most practical and trustworthy method for velocity model building from seismic data. However, geophysicists are not satisfied with the performance of the conventional semblance because of the long-standing limitations of the semblance calculations; for example, the low resolution that causes erroneous picking, expensive computation cost for the semblance in anisotropic media, and poor adaptability to the seismic data with AVO. As a result, many improved methods of semblance have been proposed to address these problems (Sarkar et al., 2001, 2002; Fomel, 2009; Luo and Hale, 2012; Hu et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015). Sarkar et al. (2001, 2002) introduced a new semblance calculation that took into account AVO information. Fomel (2009) reformulated this AVO semblance as a squared correlation coefficient between the data and a trend function, and called it AB semblance. Luo