Renal Abscess: Invasive Treatment or not

Mingrui Xia,Jun Liu,Yang Hong,Lizhe An,Liulin Xiong,Xiaobo Huang,Qingquan Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-56366/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Objective To identify possible clinical indicators to guide the choice of treatment in patients with renal abscess. Methods According to different treatment methods, 38 patients initially diagnosed with renal abscess and received no prior treatment (antipyretics excepted) in our institution from April 2006 to November 2019 were divided into conservative treatment group and invasive treatment group, with the clinical data of all the cases being analyzed retrospectively. Results In the conservative treatment group, 19 patients got success and 1 failed in initial treatment, while in the invasive treatment group, 15 patients got success and 3 failed. Of the 4 patients who failed the initial treatment, 3 had a renal abscess between 3 cm and 5 cm, and 1 failed due to long-term use of bone marrow suppressive drugs. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences between the two groups in the following factors: diabetes mellitus, body temperature ≥ 38.5℃, PLT, RDW, BUN, PLR, AG, WBC in urine, size of abscess. In logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus, RDW and size of renal abscess were retained. The cut-off of RDW and size of renal abscess were 14.07% and 3.9 cm respectively. Conclusions Size of renal abscess is still the most important factor that determining treatment modalities. Other than size, high RDW and the comorbidity of diabetes mellitus may also be used as the possible clinical indicators for the determination of invasive treatment, especially in patients with renal abscess between 3 ~ 5 cm in size.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?