Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 3 kinds of lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF,PLIF,TLIF) for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at L4.5 and L5S1 levels.Methods Data of seventy patients with lowgrade isthmic spondylolisthesis who had undergone different lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) procedures according to the assessment of the clinical manifestation,neurological symptoms,plane of the common iliac vessels and the width of "vascular window" by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography between May 2004 and May 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.21 patients had undergone anterior LIF (ALIF)(13 males and 8 females with an average of 43.29±8.15 years old (range,29-53 years old);L4,5 in ten,L5S1 in 11;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 10 cases,grade Ⅱ 11 cases);25 patients had undergone posterior LIF (PLIF) (12 males and 13 females,with an average of 44.04±12.71 years old (range,25-64 years old);L4.5 in 12,L5S1 in 13;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 15 cases,grade Ⅱ 10 cases) and 24 patients had undergone transforaminal LIF (TLIF) (12 males and 12 females with an average of 45.00± 9.36 years old (range,34-62 years old);L4,5 in 12,L5S1 in 12;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 11 cases,grade Ⅱ 13 cases).Results All patients were followed up for 24-37 months (average,25.6±8.7 months).The visual analogue scale (VAS) in all groups were decreased from 7.05±0.87 (ALIF),6.60±1.39 (PLIF),6.75±1.11 (TLIF) pre-operation to 0.90±0.70,0.96±0.68,1.04±0.62 24 months after operation.Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were decreased from 78.53％±6.25％,79.80％±6.55％,79.92％±8.10％ preoperation to 17.14％±3.01％,21.32％±4.40％,22.46％±3.87％.Perioperative data including operation time,blood loss,postoperative blood drainage,length of stay showed no significant difference between ALIF group and TLIF group,but showing significant difference comparing with PLIF group.The imageological results showed that ALIF procedure increased whole lumbar lordosis (WL) and disc height (DH),showing no significant difference comparing with PLIF group,but showing significant difference comparing with TLIF group.The ALIF procedure increased segmental lordosis angle (SL),showing significant difference comparing with PLIF group and TLIF group.The PLIF procedure decreased spondylolisthesis index (SI),showing significant difference comparing with A/TLIF group,but showing no significant difference between ALIF group and TLIF group.There was no significant difference showed comparing the L1 axis S1 distance (LASD) and sacral slope (SS),in three groups.The graft fusion was achieved in all patients after 6-8 months postoperatively without instrument failure or displacement.Conclusion Three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis showed silimar clinical efficacy.The ALIF procedure is superior in its capacity to restore WL,DH,and SL,and the P/TLIF procedure are superior in correcting the vertebral slippage and spinal cord decompression.

A comparative study of laminoplasty with short segment transpedicular screw fixation versus laminoplasty with anterior fusion in treating extensional cervical spinal cord injury without radio graphic abnormality in adults

A Clinical Study of C2 Dome-Like Expansive Laminoplasty and C2 Expansive Open-Door Laminoplastyinupper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Clinical application of a new plate fixation system in open-door laminoplasty.

Treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with laminoplasty based on individual accurate transverse diameter of the spinal canal

Extended Laminoplasty for Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Involving the C2 Segment

Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of C2 Dome-like Expansive Versus C2 Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty for Upper Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament A Retrospective Cohort Study

Analysis for Carom complex, signaling and function by database mining.

A novel defensin from the lentil Lens culinaris seeds.

Cervical single open-door laminoplasty with or without local lateral mass screw fixation and fusion to treat cervical spinal cord injuries accompanied by segmental spinal canal stenosis

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty: in Situ Reconstruction of Extensor Muscle Insertion on the C2 Spinous Process Combined with Titanium Miniplates Internal Fixation

A prospective randomized trial comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus plate-only open-door laminoplasty for the treatment of spinal stenosis in degenerative diseases

Effect of selective D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists and agonists in Cebus monkeys: implications for acute and tardive dyskinesias. A preliminary report.

Posterior Cervical Pedicle Screw-Rod/plate Instrumentation Combined with Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Compression Injury: Report of Five Cases

A novel surgical technique for cervical laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A case report and literature review

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty with Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation and Fusion for Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: a Multi-Center Prospective Study

Longitudinal Spinous‐Splitting Laminoplasty with Coral Bone for the Treatment of Cervical Adjacent Segment Degenerative Disease: A 5‐year Follow‐up Study

[Analysis of clinical efficacy of C3 expanded half lamina excision combined with unilateral open-door laminoplasty for multiple segmental cervical spinal cord compression syndrome]

Clinical Effect of Laminectomy with Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in Treating Cervical Schwannoma: A Retrospective Study

The CT Classification of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament to Guide Hybrid Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion vs. Posterior Laminoplasty

Comparison of anterior and posterior approach in the treatment of acute and chronic cervical spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis