The Role and Impact of Costing Method in the Decision‐making of Energy Project: A Comparative Assessment Between Levelized Cost of Energy and Benefit‐to‐cost Ratio Analysis

Shah Rukh Jamil,Limin Wang,Chunli Tang,Hafiz Muhammad Shahzaib Khan,Defu Che

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7470

IF: 4.6

2021-01-01

International Journal of Energy Research

Abstract:Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) method is a frequently used approach to determine the economics of an energy project. However, the approach have faced a lot of criticism due to the lack of transparency in costing along with some additional drawbacks. Although the refinement of the LCOE method has led to its improvement, but there are still some concerns in the form of considerable benefits that may produce unreliable results. In order to provide the solution of drawbacks associated with LCOE method, this research work focuses on presenting an alternative costing approach. The adoption of benefit-to-cost ratio analysis (BCRA) method for the decision-making of energy systems is proposed in this work. A comprehensive assessment between LCOE and BCRA methods was carried out with a purpose to observe their influence in determining the success or failure rate of an energy project by considering the associated benefits. For this purpose, two case studies were considered; Chena Geothermal Power Plant (Alaska, United States) and Quaid-e-Azam Solar Power Project (Bahawalpur, Pakistan). The assessment was carried out on the basis of different scenarios, which were developed according to the obtainable benefits from a particular project. The results show that, compared with the LCOE method, the BCRA method is more feasible and practical in energy project decision-making process. Moreover, it was noticed that the BCRA method can provide better and useful insights to help maximize the economic benefits of the project.