Phylogeny of Pyrus and Their Relationships Inferred from Sequences of Nuclear NIA-i3 Intron and Chloroplast Ndhc-Trnv and Trnr-Atpa

Danying Cai,Shuang Jiang,Ping Sun,Xiaoyan Zheng,Xiaoyan Yue,Yuanwen Teng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1022037/v1
2021-01-01
Abstract:Background: Pear (Pyrus L.) belongs to subtribe Malinae, tribe Maleae, family Rosaceae. According to the geography distribution, it could be divided into Oriental pear and Occidental pear. Though the phylogeny of Pyrus was complicate, previous study referring to morphology, nuclear genes and chloroplast genes made the relationships clear gradually. However, they had lower sequence divergence and less information, therefore it hardly solved the phylogeny of Pyrus. Results: A total of 100 accessions from Oriental and Occidental pears were used to elucidate the phylogeny of Pyrus by one nuclear NIA-i3 intron and two chloroplast regions (ndhC-trnV and trnR-atpA) with higher polymorphism. The Neighbor-Net phylogenetic network indicated that the phylogenetic relationships were complicate based on ndhC-trnV and trnR-atpA. Oriental pear and Occidental pear were separated in the tree of NIA-i3, P. betulaforlia, P. pashia (except P. pashia ‘P10-3’_1 and P. pashia ‘P23-4’_1) were monophyly; several P. ussuriensis were closely related with P. xerophila. However, the phylogenetic relationships of Chinese White Pear, P. pyrifolia and some P. ussuriensis still could not be well solved; West Asian species and European species were mingled together. Occidental pear P. caucasica 684,P. pyraster 989,P. elaeagrifolia 2817 might be hybrids between Oriental pear and Occidental pear.Conclusions: The phylogenetic relationships of Pyrus were still complicate because interspecies and intraspecies of Oriental pear and Occidental pear respectively were intercrossed. More genes and more accessions were needed to solve the phylogenetic relationships in Pyrus and to explore the possible parents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?