Value of Biomarkers in Liver Cancer EMT model under different interventions:A meta-analysis

Jing Yan,Shuli Zou,Bei Xie,Ye Tian,Zhiheng Peng,Zhuan Liu,Bin Ma,Linjing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-892562/v2
2021-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background There are various interventions to establish the Liver cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) models. However, the ideal biomarkers for unique model are not well established. Further studies are necessary to evaluation of effective EMT biomarkers under different interventions in vitro studies. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of different biomarkers in HepG2 cells during EMT under multiple interventions. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), Wan Fang Data, and VIP databases were systematically searched from inception to June 14, 2020 by two independent reviewers. Results A total of 58 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our study showed that E-cadherin responds well to the intervention of medication, genetic intervention, gene knockout/knockdown, hypoxia, and other tumor microenvironments, as well as non-coding RNA (ncRNA) overexpression and silencing. N-cadherin can effectively evaluate the intervention effect of medication, genetic intervention, hypoxia and other tumor microenvironments, as well as ncRNA overexpression. Vimentin reflects the effects of medication, pro-EMT genetic intervention and gene knockout/knockdown, anti-EMT ncRNA overexpression and anti-EMT ncRNA silencing and hypoxia. Snail only responds to the intervention of anti-EMT genetic intervention and gene knockout/knockdown, tumor microenvironments other than hypoxia, anti-EMT ncRNA overexpression and ncRNA silencing. Conclusions Our results shows that some medicine, some gene, microenvironment and some ncRNA can effectively induce/inhibit EMT process. E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Vimentin and Snail are effective biomarkers during this process. They respond differently to different intervention. Therefore, different biomarkers should be chosen under different intervention based on their performance.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?