Abstract:—Device drivers are security-critical. In monolithic kernels like Linux, there are hundreds of thousands of drivers which run in the same privilege as the core kernel. Consequently, a bug in a driver can compromise the whole system. More critically, drivers are particularly buggy. First, drivers receive complex and untrusted inputs from not only the user space but also the hardware. Second, the driver code can be developed by less-experienced third parties, and is less tested because running a driver requires the corresponding hardware device or the emulator. Therefore, existing studies show that drivers tend to have a higher bug density and have become a major security threat. Existing testing techniques have to focus the fuzzing on a limited number of drivers that have the corresponding devices or the emulators, thus cannot scale. In this paper, we propose a device-free driver fuzzing system, D R . F UZZ , that does not require hardware devices to fuzz-test drivers. The core of D R . F UZZ is a semantic-informed mechanism that efficiently generates inputs to properly construct relevant data structures to pass the “validation chain” in driving initialization, which enables subsequent device-free driver fuzzing. The elimination of the needs for the hardware devices and the emulators removes the bottleneck in driver testing. The semantic-informed mechanism incorporates multiple new techniques to make device-free driver fuzzing practical: inferring valid input values for passing the validation chain in initialization, inferring the temporal usage order of input bytes to minimize mutation space, and employing error states as a feedback to direct the fuzzing going through the validation chain. Moreover, the semantic-informed mechanism is generic; we can also instruct it to generate semi-malformed inputs for a higher code coverage. We evaluate D R . F UZZ on 214 Linux drivers. With an only 24- hour time budget, D R . F UZZ can successfully initialize and enable most of the drivers without the corresponding devices, whereas existing fuzzers like syzkaller cannot succeed in any case. D R . F UZZ also significantly outperforms existing driver fuzzers that are even equipped with the device or emulator in other aspects: it increases the code coverage by 70% and the throughput by 18%. With D R . F UZZ , we also find 46 new bugs in these Linux drivers.

IFIZZ: Deep-State and Efficient Fault-Scenario Generation to Test IoT Firmware

Fuzzing Error Handling Code in Device Drivers Based on Software Fault Injection

Physical Devices-Agnostic Hybrid Fuzzing of IoT Firmware

Fuzzing Error Handling Code Using Context-Sensitive Software Fault Injection.

Simulation-Based Fuzzing for Smart IoT Devices

Hardware-Assisted Control-Flow Integrity Enhancement for IoT Devices

Testing Error Handling Code with Software Fault Injection and Error-Coverage-Guided Fuzzing

Firmware Fuzzing: the State of the Art

SIoTFuzzer: Fuzzing Web Interface in IoT Firmware Via Stateful Message Generation

IoTInfer: Automated Blackbox Fuzz Testing of IoT Network Protocols Guided by Finite State Machine Inference

Towards Effective and Efficient Error Handling Code Fuzzing Based on Software Fault Injection

AflIot: Fuzzing on linux-based IoT device with binary-level instrumentation

Labrador: Response Guided Directed Fuzzing for Black-box IoT Devices

Optimizing IoT Web Fuzzing by Firmware Infomation Mining

Fw‐fuzz: A code coverage‐guided fuzzing framework for network protocols on firmware

Semantic-Informed Driver Fuzzing Without Both the Hardware Devices and the Emulators.

HuntFUZZ: Enhancing Error Handling Testing through Clustering Based Fuzzing

Research on Intelligent Fuzz Testing Technology for Power Internet of Things Terminal

Constructing Cyber-Physical System Testing Suites Using Active Sensor Fuzzing

Research on Fuzz Testing Framework for Power Internet of Things Protocol

SyzTrust: State-aware Fuzzing on Trusted OS Designed for IoT Devices