Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being utilized in a wide range of sophisticated applications, but the outcomes of many AI models are challenging to comprehend and trust due to their black-box nature. Usually, it is essential to understand the reasoning behind an AI model's decision-making. Thus, the need for eXplainable AI (XAI) methods for improving trust in AI models has arisen. XAI has become a popular research subject within the AI field in recent years. Existing survey papers have tackled the concepts of XAI, its general terms, and post-hoc explainability methods but there have not been any reviews that have looked at the assessment methods, available tools, XAI datasets, and so on. Therefore, in this comprehensive study, we provide readers with an overview of the current research and trends in this rapidly emerging area with a case study example. The review starts by explaining the background of XAI, common definitions, and summarizing recently proposed techniques in XAI for supervised machine learning. The review divides XAI techniques into four axes using a hierarchical categorization system: (i) data explainability, (ii) model explainability, (iii) post-hoc explainability, and (iv) assessment of explanations. We also introduce available evaluation metrics as well as open-source packages and datasets with future research directions. Then, the significance of explainability in terms of legal demands, user viewpoints, and application orientation is outlined, termed as XAI concerns. This paper advocates for tailoring explanation content to specific user types. An examination of XAI techniques and evaluation was conducted by looking at 410 critical articles, published between January 2016 and October 2022, in reputed journals and using a wide range of research databases as a source of information. The article is aimed at XAI researchers who are interested in making their AI models more trustworthy, as well as towards researchers from other disciplines who are looking for effective XAI methods to complete tasks with confidence while communicating meaning from data.

Trust Evolution Over Time in Explainable AI for Fake News Detection

Machine Learning Explanations to Prevent Overtrust in Fake News Detection

A Quantitative Argumentation-Based Automated Explainable Decision System for Fake News Detection on Social Media

Trust and Reliance in Consensus-Based Explanations from an Anti-Misinformation Agent

Explainability increases trust resilience in intelligent agents

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Trust, distrust, and appropriate reliance in (X)AI: a survey of empirical evaluation of user trust

Explanation matters: An experimental study on explainable AI

It is not "accuracy vs. explainability" -- we need both for trustworthy AI systems

Will We Trust What We Don't Understand? Impact of Model Interpretability and Outcome Feedback on Trust in AI

How Level of Explanation Detail Affects Human Performance in Interpretable Intelligent Systems: A Study on Explainable Fact Checking

A Turing Test for Transparency

When explainability turns into a threat - using xAI to fool a fake news detection method

The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI

User Trust and Understanding of Explainable AI: Exploring Algorithm Visualisations and User Biases

Towards Smart Fake News Detection Through Explainable AI

XFlag: Explainable Fake News Detection Model on Social Media

Examining correlation between trust and transparency with explainable artificial intelligence

The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations

Survey on Explainable AI: From Approaches, Limitations and Applications Aspects

Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2)