Individual and Regional Socioeconomic Differentials in Cognitive Ageing: A Coordinated Cross-Country Investigation Between England and China

Dorina Cadar,Laura Brocklebank,Li Yan,Yaohui Zhao,Andrew Steptoe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3951771
2021-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Background: We carried out a coordinated analysis of the associations between individual and area-level socioeconomic markers with memory performance and memory decline over up to 8 years of follow up in England and China.Methods: The analytical samples included participants aged 50+ from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (n=6,768) and Chinese Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (n=10,253). Mixed linear models were employed to examine the association between baseline socioeconomic markers (education, wealth and urbancity) and change in memory, while controlling for age, sex, marital status, hypertension, heart problems, diabetes, depressive symptoms, alcohol, and smoking.Findings: Higher education and wealth were associated with better baseline memory in both England and China, but the impact of urbanicity differed between the two countries. For English individuals, living in a rural area was indicative of a slight advantage in baseline memory when compared with those living in the urban area, while for the Chinese counterparts, the opposite pattern was observed. Memory decline was also socioeconomically patterned, primarily by higher education and wealth in China and by urbanicity levels in both countries.Interpretation: These findings suggest a substantial impact of socioeconomic inequalities on baseline memory performance at both individual and area-level characteristics in both England and China and a more pronounced effect of education and urbanicity on memory decline in China. Public health strategies for preventing cognitive decline should target the socioeconomic gaps at meso, micro and macro levels to reduce health disparities. Funding Information: The Economic and Social Research Council (grant ES/T012091/1).Declaration of Interests: All the authors declare no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the proposed work.Ethics Approval Statement: Ethical approval for each one of the ELSA waves was granted from the National Research Ethics Service (London Multicentre Research Ethics Committee [MREC/01/2/91] www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk). All participants provided informed consent, and research was performed in accordance with research and data protection guidelines.Ethical approval for each one of the CHARLS waves was granted from Human ethics application was approved by the Chair of the Science and Medical Delegated Ethics Review Committee according to National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. All participants signed two informed consents at each wave of data collection, and research was performed in accordance with research and data protection guidelines
What problem does this paper attempt to address?