Metabolomic differences and interactions between coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus: Pathogenesis understanding and auxiliary diagnosis

Wuping Liu,Pengfei Guo,Tao Dai,Xiulin Shi,Guiping Shen,Jianghua Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-47559/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background: Comprehensive understanding of plasma metabotype of diabetes (DB), coronary heart disease (CHD) and especially diabetes with coronary heart disease (CHDDB) has kept lacking. The metabolic fingerprints of CHD, DB and CHDDB were investigated to reveal their pathogenic mechanisms and interactions and identify their specific biomarkers.Methods: The plasma metabolomic differences and links of 15 DB, 15 CHD and 30 CHDDB patients and 15 matched healthy controls were investigated by NMR-based strategy. The univariate and multivariate statistical analyses-based pattern recognition was combined with network analysis to determine disease specific biomarkers and understand the corresponding pathogenic pathways.Results: A total of 17 metabolites related to the development of disease were identified by comparative metabolomic analysis, and 6 of them were shared by the three diseases. The metabolites involved in amino acid synthesis (valine, alanine, leucine, isoleucine, and N-acetyl-glycoprotein) were positively associated with CHD and CHDDB (Odds Ratios (OR) >1); The trimethylamine oxide, glycerol, lactose, indoleacetate and scyllo-inositol are closely related to the development of DB to CHDDB (OR>1), and indoleactate (OR: 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.12) and lactose (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.67-3.25) are particularly prominent in CHDDB. The three different multi-biomarker signatures could serve to distinguish between CHDDB, DB, and CHD. All diseases demonstrated the disturbed glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and amino acid biosynthesis pathway. Furthermore, inositol phosphate metabolism, tryptophan metabolism and microbiota metabolism play a major role in the development of CHDDB from DB.Conclusions: The disease-specific multi-biomarkers provide promising capability in auxiliary diagnosis of DB-related disease and follow-up of disease progression and treatment. The comparative metabolomics strategy of multi-diseases offers a comprehensive perspective in disease-specific markers and pathogenic pathways.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?