Evaluation of S2 Alar and Traditional S1 Pedicle Fixation for Severe Lumbar Spondylolisthesis in Different Bone Mineral Densities: A Finite Element Analysis

Juehan Wang,Wei Chen,Xi Yang,Ce Zhu,Tingxian Ling,Ganjun Feng,Yueming Song,Limin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-41056/v1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Background: Lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common disease in older populations. The surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis has a history of more than 50 years, with L5-S1 screws widely used in clinical practice to reduce slippage and fusion. However, some patients with severe lumbar spondylolisthesis and osteoporosis could have complications, such as internal fixation rupture, S1 screw loosening, and incomplete slippage reduction. To better treat this kind of patient, sacral screw fixation is gradually becoming more common. Little is known about the biomechanical performance of L5-S2 alar internal fixation constructs after posterior lumbar interbody fusion. This study aimed to compare L5-S1 reduction and fixation methods and explore whether extending the fixation to include the S2 alar can significantly improve the stability of the internal fixation device. METHODS: Two kinds of validated finite element models of the L5-S1 segment were reconstructed via computed tomography images, including (1) the L5-S1 screw fixation model and (2) the L5-S2 alar fixation model. The inverse repair was performed using Geomagic software, the internal fixation device was drawn using Creo software, and the model parameters were set and analyzed using ANSYS Workbench software. Results: The average load of the L5-S2 alar internal fixation device was 86.9-111% higher than that of the L5-S1 fixation device when the internal bone of the S1 screw canal yielded. In the L5-S1 fixation model, the stress was concentrated in the tail of the S1 screw, and in the L5-S2 alar fixation model, the stress was concentrated in the titanium rod. In the L5-S2 alar fixation method, the internal deformation of the S1 screw track was scattered and uniform, while in the L5-S1 fixation method, local bone destruction in the front and back ends of the screw track was prone to occur due to the stress concentration. Conclusion: Extending fixation to the S2 wing can significantly improve internal fixation device stability and reduce the risk of intraoperative and postoperative fractures while avoiding injury to the sacroiliac joint, reducing the difficulty of surgery and the risk of injury to surrounding tissues. It is a reasonable plan for the treatment of moderate and severe lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?