Nanoparticle Radiosensitization: from Extended Local Effects Model to a Survival Modification Framework of Compound Poisson Additive Killing and Its Carbon Dots Validation

Hailun Pan,Xiaowa Wang,Aihui Feng,Qinqin Cheng,Xue Chen,Xiaodong He,Xinglan Qin,Xiaolong Sha,Shen Fu,Cuiping Chi,Xufei Wang

2021-01-01

Abstract:For modeling prediction of the biological effectiveness of nanoparticle radiosensitization, an extended local effects model is first proposed in the start of this work, to give a more comprehensive description of nanoparticle mediated dose survival modification. With the local dose enhancement effects in both nucleus and cytoplasm, and the local-to-global biochemical effects taken into account, the extended local effects model presents more complete mechanisms of nanoparticle mediated killing enhancements with strong subcellular inhomogeneities, but meanwhile puts forward some fundamental issues that need further studies, including the extranuclear local dose effects, and the modeling methodologies for the local-to-global biochemical effects. To avoid the modeling difficulty, in the second part, a survival modification framework of compound Poisson additive killing is proposed for nanoparticle radiosensitization. The framework can be summarized as independent additive killing by the equivalent uniform doses of each individual particles per cell following the LQ model, thus leading to a LQ parameter modification of the dose-survival relationship. Based on the framework, a compound Poisson killing model is constructed for an analytical prediction of LQ parameter modification. Simplified form of the model is derived as concentration dependent correction only to α parameter, with (α”/α) value dominated by the mean number and modified by the agglomeration of the particles per cell. For practical use, two operational forms of the model are recommended for interpolation prediction of the correction (α”/α) using different η. In the last part, initial validation are presented by a carbon dots radiosensitization of HepG2 cells. For the (α”/α) values at the intermediate concentrations, the dose survival demonstrated a good accuracy of the monodispersion form with η=1. The prediction errors are presented in two different forms, both within 5% on average, and not exceeding 10% at the maximum.