Abstract:Purpose – This paper aims at investigating the multifaceted nature of innovation networks by focusing on two research questions: Do cluster actors exchange only one type of innovation-related knowledge? Do cluster actors play different roles in innovation-related knowledge exchange? Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on data collected at the firm level in an Italian aerospace cluster, that is a technology-intensive industry where innovation is at the base of local competitiveness. A questionnaire was used to collect both attribute data and relational data concerning collaboration and the flows of knowledge in innovation networks. The authors distinguished among three types of knowledge (technological, managerial and market knowledge) and five types of brokerage roles (coordinator, gatekeeper, liaison, representative and consultant). Data analysis relied on social network analysis techniques and software. Findings – Concerning the first research question, the findings show that different types of knowledge flow in different ways in innovation networks. The different types of knowledge are unevenly exchanged. The exchange of technological knowledge is open to everyone in the cluster. The exchange of market and managerial knowledge is selective. Concerning the second research question, the authors suggest that different types of cluster actors (large firms, small- and medium-sized enterprises, research centers and universities and institutions for collaboration) do play different roles in innovation networks, especially with reference to the three types of knowledge considered in this study. Research limitations/implications – The present paper has some limitations. First of all, the analysis focuses on just one cluster (one industry in one specific location), cross- and comparative analyses with other clusters may illuminate the findings better, eliminating industry and geographical biases. Second, the paper focuses only on innovation-related knowledge exchanges within the cluster and not across it. Practical implications – The results have practical implications both for policy makers and for managers. First, this research stresses how innovation often originates from a combination of different knowledge types acquired through the collaboration with heterogeneous cluster actors. Further, the analysis of brokerage roles in innovation-driven collaborations may help policy makers in designing programs for knowledge-transfer partnerships among the various actors of a cluster. Social implications – The paper suggests a clear need of developing professional figures capable of operating at the interface of different knowledge domains. Originality/value – The data illuminate several aspects of how innovation takes place in a cluster opening up intriguing aspects that have been overlooked by extant literature. The authors believe that this may trigger several lines of further research on the topic.

Project Management Knowledge Flows in Networks of Project Managers and Project Management Offices: A Case Study in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Cognitive Proximity, Technological Regime and Knowledge Accumulation: an Agent-Based Model of Interfirm Knowledge Exchange

Does Formal Interorganizational Relationship Shape Interpersonal Knowledge Exchange in Multiteam Construction Projects? A Multi-Level Network Analysis

Formal and Informal Practices of Knowledge Sharing between Project Teams and Enacted Cultural Characteristics

Unpacking the Effects of R&D Strategy Proximity on Inter-Firm Knowledge Flow: Evidence from the Global 3D Printing Industry

A Research on Project Management: Hot Topics and Main Knowledge Groups

The Knowledge Spillover Risks Management Framework for Collaborative Innovation

From core to periphery and back: A study on the deliberate shaping of knowledge flows in interfirm dyads and networks

The Intercultural Perspective on Project Information Management: An Empirical Study

Managing Knowledge Creation in High-Tech R&D Projects: A Multimethod Study

Quantifying knowledge exchange in R&D networks: A data-driven model

What drives inter-organisational knowledge management? The cause and effect analysis using a multi-layer multi-criteria decision-making framework

The structure of knowledge exchange network in R&D teams

Learning and Sharing in A Chinese High-Technology Cluster: A Study of Inter-Firm and Intra-Firm Knowledge Flows Between R&D Employees

Major Knowledge Diffusion Paths of Megaproject Management: A Citation-Based Analysis

Knowledge Sharing in Chinese Construction Project Teams and Its Affecting Factors

Knowledge exchanges in innovation networks: evidences from an Italian aerospace cluster

Effects Between Information Sharing and Knowledge Formation and Their Impact on Complex Infrastructure Projects’ Performance

Quality Management System for R&D Project and Portfolio Management in Pharmaceutical Company

Exploring the key drivers of inter-organizational knowledge transfer in projects: evidence from international construction projects

Software Project Managers' Knowledge Transfer: An In-Depth Interview