PeakPETCO2 Combined with FEV1/FVC Predicts Vasodilator-Responsive Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Ci-Jun Luo,Hong-Ling Qiu,Chang-Wei Wu,Jing He,Ping Yuan,Qin-Hua Zhao,Rong Jiang,Wen-Hui Wu,Su-Gang Gong,Jian Guo,Rui Zhang,Jin-Ming Liu,Lan Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20458940211059713
2021-01-01
Pulmonary Circulation
Abstract:Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and pulmonary function test are important methods for detecting human cardio-pulmonary function. Whether they could screen vasoresponsiveness in idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension (IPAH) patients remains undefined. One hundred thirty-two IPAH patients with complete data were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were classified as vasodilator-responsive (VR) group and vasodilator-nonresponsive (VNR) group on the basis of the acute vasodilator test. Pulmonary function test and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were assessed subsequently and all patients were confirmed by right heart catheterization. We analyzed cardiopulmonary exercise testing and pulmonary function test data and derived a prediction rule to screen vasodilator-responsive patients in IPAH. Nineteen of VR-IPAH and 113 of VNR-IPAH patients were retrospectively enrolled. Compared with VNR-IPAH patients, VR-IPAH patients had less severe hemodynamic effects (lower RAP, m PAP, PAWP, and PVR). And VR-IPAH patients had higher anaerobic threshold (AT), peak partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2), oxygen uptake efficiency (OUEP), and FEV1/FVC (P all <0.05), while lower peak partial pressure of end-tidal oxygen (PETO2) and minute ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide output (VCO2) slope (P all <0.05). FEV1/FVC (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.26, P = 0.02) and PeakP(ET)CO(2) (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.26, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of VR adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A novel formula (=-16.17 + 0.123 x PeakP(ET)CO(2) + 0.127xFEV(1)/FVC) reached a high area under the curve value of 0.8 (P = 0.003). Combined with these parameters, the optimal cutoff value of this model for detection of VR is -1.06, with a specificity of 91% and sensitivity of 67%. Compared with VNR-IPAH patients, VR-IPAH patients had less severe hemodynamic effects. Higher FEV1/FVC and higher peak PETCO2 were associated with increased odds for vasoresponsiveness. A novel score combining PeakP(ET)CO(2) and FEV1/FVC provides high specificity to predict VR patients among IPAH.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?