Synergistic Effects of Ozone/peroxymonosulfate for Isothiazolinone Biocides Degradation: Kinetics, Synergistic Performance and Influencing Factors.

Zheng-Wei Yang,Wen-Long Wang,Min-Yong Lee,Qian-Yuan Wu,Yun-Tao Guan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118626
IF: 8.9
2021-01-01
Environmental Pollution
Abstract:Synergistic effects of ozone (O3) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS, HSO5xe213; ) for isothiazolinone biocides degradation was studied. The synergistic ozonation process (O3/PMS) increased the efficiency of methyl-isothiazolinone (MIT) and chloro-methyl-isothiazolinone (CMIT) degradation to 91.0% and 81.8%, respectively, within 90 s at pH 7.0. This is 30.6% and 62.5% higher than the corresponding ozonation efficiency, respectively. Total radical formation value (Rct,center dot R) for the O3/PMS process was 24.6 times that of ozonation alone. Calculated second-order rate constants for the reactions between isothiazolinone biocides and xfffc; (kSO4 center dot-,MIT and kSO4 center dot-,CMIT) were 8.15 x 109 and 4.49 x 109 Mxe213; 1 sxe213; 1, respectively. Relative contributions of O3, hydroxyl radical (center dot OH) and oxidation to MIT and CMIT removal were estimated, which were 15%, 45%, and 40% for O3, center dot OH and oxidation to MIT, and 1%, 67%, and 32% for O3, center dot OH and xfffc; oxidation to CMIT at pH 7.0, respectively. Factors influencing the O3/PMS process, namely the solution pH, chloride ions (Clxe213; ), and bicarbonate (HCO3xe213; ), were evaluated. Increasing the solution pH markedly accelerated O3 decay and center dot OH and xfffc; formation, thus weakening the relative contribution of O3 oxidation while enhancing that of center dot OH and xfffc; . Clxe213; had a negligible effect on MIT and CMIT degradation. Under the dual effect of bicarbonate (HCO3xe213; ) as inhibitor and promoter, low concentrations (1-2 mM) of bicarbonate weakly promoted MIT and CMIT degradation, while high concentrations (10-20 mM) induced strong inhibition. Lastly, oxidation performance of O3 and O3/PMS processes for MIT and CMIT degradation in different water matrices was compared.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?