Comparative Study of Different Inflammation Definition Methods of GLIM in the Diagnosis of Malnutrition in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis
Hao Fu,Ping Li,Jie Yang,Hui Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s485400
IF: 2.145
2024-10-25
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Hao Fu, 1 Ping Li, 2 Jie Yang, 1 Hui Jiang 1 1 Nutrition Department, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, People's Republic of China; 2 Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Hao Fu, Nutrition Department, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, No. 36, Nanyingzi Street, Chengde, Heibei, 067000, People's Republic of China, Tel +86 0314 2279680, Email Purpose: This study aims to investigate the influence of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) on diagnosing malnutrition in acute pancreatitis (AP) based on various inflammatory criteria. Patients and Methods: A total of 258 AP patients admitted to a large medical center between June 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent evaluation using the original GLIM and GLIM criteria based on C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and CRP/albumin ratio (CAR). The study explored the impact of malnutrition diagnosis using different GLIM criteria on various clinical outcomes of AP patients and assessed the agreement of different GLIM criteria compared to the original GLIM. Results: Thirty-seven (14.34%) patients were malnourished according to the original GLIM criteria. Using the other four criteria, malnutrition rates ranged from 6.59% to 12.40%. Malnutrition diagnosed by all GLIM criteria was associated with local complications. Malnutrition identified by the original, CRP-based, and CAR-based GLIM criteria was also associated with infectious complications and composite outcomes. Meanwhile, albumin-based malnutrition was associated with all adverse outcomes except organ failure. When considering all four GLIM criteria except the original one, malnourished patients exhibited longer lengths of stay than non-malnourished patients. Under the CRP- and albumin-based GLIM criteria, hospitalization costs were higher for malnourished patients. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of the results. The agreement of the four GLIM criteria with the original GLIM criteria were consistent with the corresponding incidence of malnutrition. Conclusion: This study validated the GLIM criteria for the first time in AP. Malnourished patients were more likely to experience local complications than non-malnourished AP patients. However, the inconsistency between GLIM criteria based on disease burden and various inflammatory markers was significant. The inflammatory marker-based GLIM criteria demonstrated a stronger predictive value than the original GLIM criteria in assessing prognosis in AP patients. Keywords: acute pancreatitis, GLIM criteria, inflammatory marker, malnutrition, outcome Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common acute diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. The 2012 revision of the Atlanta Classification categorizes AP as mild, moderately severe, or severe. 1 In AP, especially in moderately severe AP and severe AP (SAP), inflammatory and septic complications increase metabolism, energy requirements, and proteolytic metabolism. Additionally, AP patients tend to eat less due to abdominal pain. Hence, all AP patients are at risk of malnutrition. 2 Malnutrition and the risk of malnutrition are associated with adverse outcomes, including higher complication rates, prolonged length of stay (LOS) and increased mortality. 3–5 Therefore, assessing the nutritional status of AP patients is crucial. However, the diagnostic criteria for malnutrition vary, leading to inconsistencies in comparisons among studies. To standardize the current diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in hospitalized adults, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) working group published new diagnostic criteria for malnutrition in 2018, including phenotypic and etiologic criteria. 6 One of the etiologic criteria for GLIM is inflammation; however, the original GLIM construct description provided limited guidance on how to assess inflammation to support the diagnosis of malnutrition. This lack of clarity has resulted in inconsistencies in the methods used to determine inflammation in studies validating the GLIM criteria. For instance, a review of GLIM studies involving older adults revealed a variety of approaches used to assess inflammation: more than half relied solely on the diagnosis of inflammatory disease, while others primarily used C-reactive protein (CRP) alone or in combination with the presence of inflammatory disease. 7 To tackle the issue of inflammation assessment in the GLIM criteria, the GLIM working group published a guidance in late 2023 suggesting that the presence of acute or -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal