Recreational Runners with Obesity Can Maintain Cardiorespiratory, Metabolic and Gait Parameters Similar to Runners with Healthy Weight over A 30 Minute Run

Heather K. Vincent,Lauren H. Summerville,Sarah F. Cordier,Cong Chen,Kevin R. Vincent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000759400.70816.ae
2021-01-01
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Abstract:PURPOSE: To determine whether cardiorespiratory, metabolic and gait parameters in recreational runners with and without obesity change differentially during a 30-minute run. METHODS: This was a repeated measures two group comparison of physiological responses and gait characteristics during a session of running. Recreational runners (N = 21; 38.1 ± 7.6 yr, 32.5 ± 6.2 km/wk) were stratified by body mass index (BMI; <30 [non-obese] and ≥ 30 kg/m2[obese]). Cardiopulmonary and metabolic outcome variables were measured using a portable gas analysis system and heart rate monitor. Temporalspatial, kinetic and kinematic outcome measures of running gait were collected using a 3D motion capture system and an instrumented treadmill. All runners performed 30-minute run at a self-selected, constant 5 K event pace. All outcome measures were compared at minutes 5, 15 and 30 of the run. RESULTS: Self-selected running velocities were 10.2 ± 1.4 km/h and 7.7 ± 1.1 km/h in the non-obese and obese runners, respectively (p < 0.05). After covarying for velocity, runners with obesity demonstrated 19% lower VO2 values, 8% higher minute ventilation and similar rating of perceived exertion during the run. Heart rate values increased more over 30 minutes for the non-obese runners (from 148 bpm to 163 bpm versus 164 bpm to 16 bpm; p = 0.05). Peak ground reaction forces were 12%-13.9% higher at each time point in the runners with obesity and impact loading rates were 28.9%-44.2% lower than non-obese runners. Ankle, knee, hip and pelvis joint angles, joint range of motion excursions, temporalspatial parameters or ankle, knee and hip powers or moments did not differ between groups over the 30-minute run. CONCLUSIONS: Although recreational runners with obesity may run more slowly, this population can maintain consistency with physiologic responses and do not incur changes in temporalspatial, kinetic and kinematic gait features linked to musculoskeletal injury risk. Running at slower velocities may be a strategy to help offset injury risks associated with excessive weight.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?