A Satellite‐Based Estimate of Convective Vertical Velocity and Convective Mass Flux: Global Survey and Comparison With Radar Wind Profiler Observations
Jeyavinoth Jeyaratnam,Zhengzhao Johnny Luo,Scott E. Giangrande,Dié Wang,Hirohiko Masunaga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl090675
IF: 5.2
2021-01-09
Geophysical Research Letters
Abstract:Convective vertical velocity (wc) and convective mass flux (Mc) lie at the heart of global climate model cumulus parameterizations, but few observations of these critical parameters are available. This paper develops and evaluates a novel, satellite‐based method for estimating profiles of wc and Mc. Comparisons with collocated ground‐based radar wind profiler (RWP) observations show that satellite‐estimated median wc is slightly greater than the RWP estimates, but they show solid agreement when compared at the 95th percentiles (intense updrafts). RWP‐derived and satellite‐estimated Mc are broadly comparable in the lower and middle troposphere, with some differences in the upper troposphere due to differences in convective core sampling. A k‐means cluster analysis of multiple years of wc data shows that convective characteristics are distinctly different among extratropical convection, tropical land convection, and tropical oceanic convection. Tropical land convection is significantly more intense and more variable than the oceanic counterpart. Properly representing and parameterizing cumulus convection has long been a central task of the global climate models (GCMs), as GCM simulations are highly sensitive to the assumptions made in the cumulus parameterization schemes, resulting in large uncertainties in predicting the future climate change. At the heart of many of today's GCM convection parameterizations are convective vertical velocity (wc) and mass flux (Mc). Yet, few global observations of these critical parameters are available at this time globally. To improve this situation, the authors developed a novel, satellite‐based method for estimating profiles of wc and Mc. We first evaluate the satellite estimates against collocated ground‐based radar wind profiler (RWP) retrievals. RWP‐derived and satellite‐estimated wc and Mc are found to be broadly comparable, and their agreement improves when differences in sampling and definitions of convective clouds are considered. A k‐means cluster analysis of multiple years of satellite‐estimated wc data is performed to identify salient patterns related to the structure and global distributions of convective vertical velocity. Results show that convective characteristics are distinctly different among extratropical convection, tropical land convection, and tropical oceanic convection. Our ongoing work seeks to use this newly developed wc and Mc data set to evaluate GCM cumulus parameterizations. A novel, satellite‐based method was developed to retrieve profiles of convective vertical velocity (wc) and convective mass flux (Mc) Comparisons with collocated ground‐based radar wind profiler observations show broad agreements A k‐means cluster analysis shows that convective vertical velocity is distinctly different between tropical land and oceanic convection A novel, satellite‐based method was developed to retrieve profiles of convective vertical velocity (wc) and convective mass flux (Mc) Comparisons with collocated ground‐based radar wind profiler observations show broad agreements A k‐means cluster analysis shows that convective vertical velocity is distinctly different between tropical land and oceanic convection
geosciences, multidisciplinary