Surgically Treated Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures in Adolescents: Risks and Outcomes of 3 Fixation Constructs
Brendan A Williams,Matthew Titus,Nathan Chaclas,Stefano Cardin,Lawrence Wells,Kathleen J Maguire,J Todd Lawrence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002799
2024-08-27
Abstract:Introduction: Avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity (AFIT) are uncommon injuries that sometimes require operative fixation with screws, suture anchors, or cortical suspensory buttons. This study reviewed a series of surgically managed AFITs at a single institution and compared outcomes among fixation strategies. We hypothesized there would be no difference in outcomes between fixation types. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients treated operatively at a single institution from 2010 to 2022 for AFIT identified by CPT code (27215). We collected patient demographics, injury characteristics, Revised Modified Oxford Bone Score, radiographic measures, fracture classification (type 1-lateral vs. type 2-complete), surgical fixation technique, postoperative complications (Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink [M-CDS] Complication Classification), and time to return to sport (RTS). Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were performed. Results: Study criteria identified 16 patients with surgically treated AFITs during the study period. Patients were predominantly male (88%) with a mean age of 14.8±0.8 years. Injured patients most commonly participated in soccer (38%), with the most common mechanism of injury being running/sprinting (50%). The avulsed fracture fragments were a mean of 42.6 mm in size, with an average maximal displacement of 21.1 mm and predominantly type 1-lateral (75%). Surgical constructs included: screws (4), suture anchors (5), cortical suspensory buttons (6), and combined (1, screw and suture anchor). Postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (50%) including 7 type 1 and 1 type 3 M-CDS. No statistically significant difference was found between fixation types among the studied outcome variables; however, re-fracture (1 case [M-CDS type 3]) was only observed with a combined (screw and suture anchor) construct. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study demonstrated that postoperative complications after ORIF for AFIT were not infrequent but were largely low in severity. Refracture occurred only with a combined screw and suture anchor construct. Consistent return to sport was achieved across all fixation types, with no significant difference in complication rate between constructs, although the available study sample limited robust analysis. This study is also, of note, one of the first to report outcomes from cortical suspensory buttons (CSB)-a relatively novel intervention for AFIT. Findings from this retrospective case series of multiple surgical techniques serve to bolster the limited literature base regarding the operative treatment of AFITs in adolescents.