THE ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF GASTROPOD TORSION
M. Ghiselin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03370.x
1966-09-01
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
Abstract:Unique among mollusks, the Gastropoda are characterized by a curious asymmetry, resulting from a rotation of the visceral hump and shell. Thus in the earlier stages of their embryonic development, gastropods have the same arrangement of parts as other mollusks, with the rudiments of the mantle cavity, gills, coelomic ducts, and associated structures at the posterior end of the body. But eventually, the entire shell, and along with it the mantle cavity and its contained organs, undergoes a counterclockwise rotation, relative to the head and foot, of about 180 degrees. As a result, the mantle cavity, gills, etc., come to lie directly above the head, and the internal parts undergo a rearrangement (Figs. 1, 2). This displacement, referred to as torsion, should not be confused with the spiral coiling of the shell and visceral hump, which is a separate disturbance of symmetry. Common garden snails have both torsion and coiling; the shells of limpets are no longer coiled, but torsion may be seen in the twisted condition of the internal structures. The questions of how torsion originated and what, if anything, is its adaptive significance, are important for several reasons. Torsion is the diagnostic character of the second-largest class in the animal kingdom (in number of described species); an understanding of the process which gave rise to such a taxonomically important property may cast some light on major problems of macroevolution. In the historical analysis of the theoretical literature, one may also gain valuable insights into the validity of various kinds of phylogenetic arguments. It is especially revealing to consider the weakness of some arguments which are widely accepted. Finally, one theory explaining torsion invokes both paedomorphosis and what almost amounts to a macromutation. Not only is this theory widely held, but its truth is used as a premise in theoretical arguments (e.g., de Beer, 1958); the broad implications of such theoretical discussions necessitates rigorous testing of their fundamental premises. Even if one cannot discover which explanation is correct, the elaboration of alternatives removes the support for theories derived from one of them. The following discussion attempts a critical review and synthesis of the problem of torsion, and suggests a new explanatory theory.