Abstract:Modelling the volatility has attracted a great deal of attention in the literature of financial economics and econometrics.As a measure of risk,volatility modelling is important to researchers,policy makers and regulators as it is closely related to the stability of financial markets,and the SV models are used to model the dynamics of volatility.It has been well-documented in the literature that the volatility exhibits two typical features,namely the asymmetric effects (include leverage and size effects) on volatility caused by previous returns and the long-range dependence in volatility.It is important to accommodate these features in volatility in the SV models.In recent years,high-frequency financial data is available and a number of realized measures of volatility have been introduced,including realized volatility and realized range volatility.These measures are far more informative about the current level of volatility than the daily returns.Standard SV models utilizes daily returns to extract information about the current level of volatility.A shortcoming of conventional SV models is the fact that returns are rather weak signals about the level of volatility.This makes SV models poorly suited for situations where volatility changes rapidly to a new level.Incorporating realized measures into SV models is expected to alleviate this problem.Based on the above analysis,in this paper the two-factor asymmetric realized SV (2FARSV) model is proposed,which incorporates the basic SV model (which uses daily returns) with asymmetric effects (leverage and size effects),long memory property of the volatility and high-frequency intraday information provided by the realized measure by taking account of the realized measure biases.A maximum likelihood estimation method based on the continuous particle filters is used to estimate the parameters of the 2FARSV model.The monte Carlo simulation study shows that the estimation method performs well.The 2FARSV model is appiled to the realized volatility (RV) and realized range volatility (RRV) computed from the high-frequency intraday data of Shanghai Stock Exchange composite index and Shenzhen Stock Exchange component index.The results show that the RV and RRV are (downward) biased estimators of the true daily volatility.This implies that the effect of non-trading hours is stronger than that of microstructure noise.The RRV is the more effective volatility estimator than the RV,but it leads to more downward bias.In addition,evidence of strong volatility persistence and volatility asymmetry (leverage and size effects) is detected in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets.According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC),the 2FARSV model fits the data better than the one-factor asymmetric realized SV (1FARSV) model,the two-factor realized SV (2FRSV) model,the two-factor leverage realized SV (2FLRSV) model and the realized GARCH model.Model diagnostics suggest that the 2FARSV model is sufficient to capture the dynamics of the volatility (time-varying volatility,volatility clustering,volatility asymmetry and long memory property of the volatility).This study enriches the empirical research on the volatility modelling based on the high-frequency data.It's also a worthwhile endeavor to further investigate the performance of the 2FARSV model in asset pricing and value-at-risk calculation.

Good volatility, bad volatility, and time series return predictability

Conditional Tail-Related Risk Estimation Using Composite Asymmetric Least Squares and Empirical Likelihood

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable? A Generalized Cross-Spectral Approach

Stock market return predictability revisited: Evidence from a new index constructing the oil market

Stock Return and Cash Flow Predictability: the Role of Volatility Risk

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

Good idiosyncratic volatility, bad idiosyncratic volatility, and the cross-section of stock returns

Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia

Semivariance Premium and Expected Stock Returns

Web search volume acceleration and cross-sectional returns

Bayesian Reconciliation of Return Predictability

Two-factor Asymmetric Realized SV Model and Its Empirical Test

Forecasting volatility of stock indices: Improved GARCH-type models through combined weighted volatility measure and weighted volatility indicators

High-Dimensional Volatility Matrix Estimation with Cross-Sectional Dependent and Heavy-Tailed Microstructural Noise

Predictive Regressions: Method of Least Autocorrelation

Volatility measurement with pockets of extreme return persistence

Time-Varying Return Predictability in the Chinese Stock Market

A neural network enhanced volatility component model