Abstract:Recent studies have shown spatial heterogeneity in the perception of multiple feature dimensions (Afraz, Pashkam, & Cavanagh, 2010), and also stable individual biases in object localization (Kosovicheva & Whitney, 2017). Considering the role of selective attention in visual perception (Boynton, 2005; Luck & Ford, 1998), we hypothesized that attentional capture would also exhibit spatial heterogeneity across display locations. In 3 experiments, we used modified versions of the additional singleton paradigm (Theeuwes, 1991, 1992) to test this hypothesis. In Experiment 1, distractors were defined on the color dimension. We tuned the relative saliency of the only color singleton into 5 levels using a linear interpolation method. A vertical segment or a horizontal segment was contained within the target form singleton, which appeared equally-often at each of the eight locations. After the location of the target was set, the color distractor appeared equally-often at the other seven locations. In Experiment 2 and 3, distractors were defined on the orientation and size dimension respectively. The five distractor saliency conditions were specified by the relative inclination of the line segment contained within one of the non-target stimuli in Experiment 2, and by the relative size of one of the non-target stimuli in Experiment 3. The results showed a unique spatial distractibility pattern for each participant, with RT (reaction time) at some display locations demonstrating significant differences between distractor-present and distractor-absent conditions while some not. The stability and distinctiveness of spatial heterogeneity for attentional capture susceptibility for each participant were demonstrated by the high within-individual effect size correlation between 2 rounds and the low between-individual effect size correlation across display locations. These findings suggest that stimuli displayed at some spatial locations seem to be intrinsically easier to capture attention, which offers further insights for understanding the relationship between visual attention and perception.

The Effect of Saliency Between Distractor and Target Attention Capture

Neural Suppression of Distractors Surrounding the Spotlight: Evidence from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Understanding the PD and the N2pc: Modeling the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Spatial Attention Shifts

Tracking the Misallocation and Reallocation of Spatial Attention toward Auditory Stimuli

A modified oddball paradigm “cross-modal delayed response” and the research on mismatch negativity

Neural evidence for attentional capture by salient distractors

Face Capture More Attentional Resource Than No-face Object: an ERP Study.

Spatial Heterogeneity for Attentional Capture Susceptibility

Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search

Contingent Capture Can Occur at Specific Feature Values: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence

Salience Determines Attentional Orienting in Visual Selection.

Category-based Attentional Capture Can Be Influenced by Color- and Shape-Dimensions Independently in the Conjunction Search Task.

The Effect of Visuospatial Attentional Load on the Processing of Irrelevant Acoustic Distractors

Attentional Capture is Contingent on the Interaction Between Task Demand and Stimulus Salience

Relative saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of color and face singleton distractors: evidence from event-related potential studies

Salient distractor processing: inhibition following attentional capture

Rapid Disengagement Hypothesis and Signal Suppression Hypothesis of Visual Attentional Capture

First encounters: Estimating the initial magnitude of attentional capture

Neural Correlates of Visual Attentional Capture

Reward Captures Attention Independent of the Current Focus of Attention

Cross-Modal Selective Attention to Visual and Auditory Stimuli Modulates Endogenous Erp Components