Abstract:<p>Evaluating the information quality of cQA (community question‐answering) websites helps users select a cQA website with high‐quality information and improves the information quality. In this paper, an approach to evaluating the information quality of cQA based on a novel hybrid multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) model is proposed. First, the source, content, expression and usefulness criteria for evaluating the information quality of the cQA are established. Then, considering the ambiguity and inner correlations of the criteria, DANP ([DEMATEL]‐based Analytic Network Process) and TODIM (interactive and multiple attribute decision making, in Portuguese) methods are combined in a two‐dimensional linguistic environment to process linguistic evaluation information. Lastly, the proposed approach is applied to evaluate the quality of five popular cQA websites. The key criteria are identified, and the evaluation results are derived comprehensively. The key factors consist of reputation, coverage, politeness, usability, helpfulness, clarity, readability and conciseness. The websites, Know almost and Baidu knows, perform better in terms of information quality. The application, along with the sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, shows the effectiveness of the proposed model. The proposed approach has both practical and research implications. It provides an approach for users to choose websites, and, for operators, to improve the information quality of their website. The evaluation criteria and their relations provide a reference for research on the information quality. The evaluation method considers the user's psychological information to provide a more accurate MCDM approach. The comprehensive aspects of the experiment can be used to verify the other MCDM methods.</p>

Answer Evaluation In Q&A Community Site On The Topic Of Natural Disaster

Quality Evaluation and Prediction for Question and Answer in Chinese Community Question Answering

Research on Information Quality Evaluation Method of Q&A Community from the Perspective of Fuzzy Evaluation

Answer Quality Assessment In Cqa Based On Similar Support Sets

Answer Quality Analysis on Community Question Answering

An Answer Quality Evaluation Algorithm Based on Semantic in Community-Based Question Answering.

Want a Good Answer? Ask a Good Question First!

Research on the Quality Prediction of Online Chinese Question Answering Community Answers Based on Comments.

Defining High-Quality Answers on a Chinese Tourism Q&A Platform in Terms of Information Needs

Question Answering System Based on Community QA

Modeling information-seeker satisfaction in community question answering

Answer Quality Characteristics and Prediction on an Academic Q&A Site: A Case Study on ResearchGate

Analyzing Question Attractiveness in Community Question Answering.

A hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with TODIM to evaluate the information quality of community question answering in a two‐dimensional linguistic environment

Evaluating Academic Answer Quality: A Pilot Study On Researchgate Q&A

A Supernetwork-Based Online Post Informative Quality Evaluation Model

Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA

Evaluating the quality of educational answers in community question-answering

Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering

Question Retrieval with High Quality Answers in Community Question Answering.

An Unsupervised Approach for Low-Quality Answer Detection in Community Question-Answering