Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal complications prevail towards the architecture of mutual policy design between trade and climate change regimes. The recent literature on this topic is mainly focused on commons and has significantly ignored the existing regulatory constraints between both the regimes. Therefore, in this study relevant WTO and environmental laws are critically examined in order to bring another side of literally work on trade‐climate policy framework. Moreover, the time factor, role of developing countries and two approaches are also discussed that are important constituents to be considered during ongoing climate change multilateral talks. Design/methodology/approach This paper has six parts in total. Part one comprises of “Introduction”, part two gives “Overview of relevant WTO and climate change regulations”, part three describes “Antithesis of WTO and climate change rules” and explains the differences that both regimes posses in the basics of their nature, part four enumerates that how to galvanize the anticipated disputes among both the regimes, part five is focused on the participation of developing countries and their possible reservations towards climate policy and, part six gives some concluding remarks. Findings This study found four major points of caution while architecting climate change policy. First, the climate change policy gives excuse to certain economies to protect their domestic industry, which is supposedly the violation of WTO rules. Second, the disputes arise at WTO platform from the climate friendly trade policies would be a new inconvincible challenge. Third, the GATT article XX (general exceptions) and agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (ASCM) are still not clearly defined under climate change regime. Fourth, the position of least developed countries (LDCs), there is no action plan as these countries are the most affected due to possible stringent trade‐climate policies. Research limitations/implications This research posses potential policy implication for both governments and international organizations, and provides new direction to trade and climate change researchers. It opens the way to critically examine the legal issues addressed in this paper which subsequently help both trade climate change regimes to overcome such regulatory differences with mutual consensus. Practical implications As policy implication this study suggests that what has been achieved during last two decades over climate change issue, and how long would it take to achieve the reasonable targets? In‐fact, the past work has succeeded to address the climate change as the global issue and it needs to be solved jointly but there is still a long way to make potential progress in order to architect the comprehensive policy and designing of multilateral agreements. It needs more time to constitute a climate change regime free from individual countries' political and economical interests and consensus amongst all major countries and group. Originality/value Most the current literature only focuses common options between trade and climate change policy regimes and significantly ignores the potential legal constraints. In this regards, this study fills existing gap in trade and climate change policy constraints and gives another new direction for policy makers.

The Climate-Trade Conundrum: A Critical Analysis Of The Wto'S Jurisprudence On Subsidies To Renewable Energy

Renewable Energy, Subsidies, and the WTO: Where Has the 'Green' Gone?

What Does the Recent WTO Litigation on Renewable Energy Subsidies Tell Us About Methodology in Legal Analysis? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Green Subsidies and WTO Trade Rules: A Conflict of Values or A Conflict of Norms?

International Trade Law and Domestic Policy: Canada, the United States and the WTO by Jacqueline D. Krikorian (review)

An Appraisal of WTO’s Role in Promoting Substantive Fairness while Regulating Border Carbon Tax Adjustments

From System Assumption to Trade Policy:Obstacle of the U.S Carbon Tariff Transformation

An Environmental Agreement in a Trade Court – Is the WTO's Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies Enforceable?

A Study on the Relationship Between Non-market Economies and Anti-subsidy Law——From the Perspective of the American Anti-subsidy Law

Climate Change and Trade Policy: from Legal Complications to Time Factor

Renewable Energy and the Free Movement of Goods

Measures for Stimulating the Renewable Energy Industry and its Compatibility with WTO SCM——Agreement-From the Perspective of the Carbon Emission Free Allow System

US―China Green Trade Conflict and Implications for Low-Carbon Energy Transition: The Solar Energy Trade Dispute

On the Pneumatic OTR Tires Case from a Multilateral Trade Perspective——And Analyze the Judicial Practice of US Anti-Subsidy Law

International Trade Disputes over Renewable Energy—the Case of the Solar Photovoltaic Sector

The Impact Analysis of WTO Dispute Resolutions on the Chinese Agricultural Support Policies

How can the rule of law under the WTO framework ensure sustainable fishery governance through fishery subsidies? A study from the perspective of special and differential treatment

The WTO’s Exclusive and Compulsory Jurisdiction v.Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Regional Trade Agreements: A Clash of Jurisdiction?

Power Market Equilibrium Under The Joint Fip-Rps Renewable Energy Incentive Mechanism In China

Limitations of WTO Disputes Settlement Mechanism in Domestic Implementation of TRIPS Agreement

Climate Neutral Production, Free Allocation of Allowances under Emissions Trading Systems, and the WTO: How to Secure Compatibility with the ASCM