Abstract:At the time of the election of the European Parliament (EP) in 2014, the European Union (EU) was heavily affected by a multifaceted crisis that had – and still has – far‐reaching implications for the political system of its member countries, but also for the European level of governance. Against the background of the strong Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 EP elections, this study aims to investigate in which way Eurosceptic parties of the left and the right respond to the multiple crises of the EU. Using data from the Euromanifesto Project from 2004/2009 and 2014, changes in the party positions towards the EU are analysed in the shadow of the multiple crises and the reasons thereof are explored. The findings show a general anti‐European shift among the two types of Eurosceptic parties. Nevertheless, the changes in the EU polity tone are not determined by issue‐based repercussions of the multiple crises, but by the EU‐related evaluation – the polity mood – of the national citizenry. For far‐right Eurosceptic parties, the shift is moderated by the level of public support for EU integration in their national environment. Among far‐left Eurosceptic parties, by contrast, it is moderated by the more specific public attitudes about the monetary union policy of the EU. Consequently, political parties when drafting their manifestos for EP elections are not so much guided by the objective severity of political problems or by the evaluations of these problems by the citizenry. What matters in the end is the link that citizens themselves are able to establish between the severity of political problems, on the one hand, and the responsibility of the EU for these problems on the other. This has important consequences for understanding of the nature and substance of political responsiveness within the EU system of multilevel governance.

Supranational Governance And The Problem Of The "Dignified Constitution"

The common sense of European integration

Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration

Europe's Economic Constitution in Crisis and the Emergence of a New Constitutional Constellation

European foreign policy since the Cold War: How ambitious, how inhibited?

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

The Euro’s Taxing Path to Political Legitimacy

First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States

Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation

Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community

The Danes and the Maastricht treaty: The Danish EC referendum of June 1992

Failing forward? Crises and patterns of European integration

Responding to the crisis: Eurosceptic parties of the left and right and their changing position towards the European Union

EU Responses to the Democratic Deficit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism?

Parliamentarization of the CFSP through informal institution-making? The fifth European Parliament and the EU high representative

The Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: Continuity and Change in European Crisis Management â By E. Gross

Mapping the moral foundations of the European Union: Why a lack of moral diversity may undermine perceived EU legitimacy

Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games

Managing constraint: frugal opposition to European fiscal solidarity

Zwischen Sorbonne-Rede 2.0 und Neuwahlen – Macrons Visionen im Realitätstest

How intergovernmental are Intergovernmental Conferences? An example from the Maastricht Treaty reform