Two New MOFs Based on a Flexible Tripod Ligand, Structure Regulation, Stability, Hirshfeld Surface Analysis and Fluorescence Properties

Mei-Mei Jia,Xiao-Yu Zhang,Qing-Lin Yang,Ding-Qi Xiong,Peng-Kun Fu,Miao-Miao Jiao,Xiao-Long Wang,Xiu-Yan Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958972.2021.1979528
2021-01-01
Journal of Coordination Chemistry
Abstract:In this work, two MOFs, {[Cd-3(L)(2)(m-BDC)(NO3)(4)]center dot 2(H2O)}(n) (1) and [Zn-3(L)(m-BDC)(3)](n) (2), were synthesized using the hydrothermal method. Single crystal diffraction showed that the flexible tripod ligand L (1,3,5-[1-(2-methylimidazole-methylene)]benzene) delivers completely different configurations under the influence of the coordination metal [Cd(II), Zn(II)] ions, resulting in two completely different structures. In 1, the flexible tripod ligand L adopted a "chair" conformation which combined with Cd(II) ions, forming a two-dimensional structure in the orthorhombic C222(1) space group. In 2, L adopted a "bowl" conformation which combined with Zn(II) ions, forming another two-dimensional structure in the P-3m1 space group. The synthesized MOFs were characterized by PXRD, thermogravimetry (TGA), infrared spectroscopy (IR), elemental analysis, fluorescence property analysis, Hirshfeld surface analysis, and density functional theory (DFT) quantitative calculations. The fluorescence analysis displayed that the maximum emission wavelength of 1 and 2 has a blue shift. In addition, the results of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the thermal stability of 1 is 150 degrees C higher than that of 2. This is probably because the energy of "chair" conformation is lower than that of the "bowl" conformation, which makes 1 more stable than that of 2.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?