Abstract:Purpose Safety professionals' primary job is to execute safety control measures towards frontline personnel, and previous studies focus on the effectiveness of such controls. Rare research efforts, however, have been devoted to the effectiveness of management control measures towards safety professionals themselves. This study aimed to fill up this knowledge gap by examining whether safety professionals under differing management control configurations differ in their work attitudes, including affective commitment, job satisfaction, career commitment and intention to quit. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a holistic view of control, five forms of management control, i.e. outcome control, process control, capability control, professional control and reinforcement, were investigated. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey targeting at construction safety professionals was conducted. The latent profile analysis approach was employed to identify how the five forms of management control are configured, i.e. identifying the distinctive patterns of control profiles. The Bolck–Croon–Hagenaars method was then used to examine whether safety professionals' work attitudes were different across the identified control profiles. Findings Seven distinct control profiles were extracted from the sample of 475 construction safety professionals. The overall test of outcome means showed that mean levels of affective commitment, job satisfaction and intentions to quit were significantly different across the seven profiles. The largest that was also the most desirable subgroup was the high control profile (n = 161, 33.9%). The least desirable subgroups included the low control profile (n = 75, 15.8%) and the low capability and professional control profile (n = 12, 2.5%). Pairwise comparison suggested that capability, professional and process controls were more effective than outcome control and reinforcement. Originality/value In theory, this study contributes to the burgeoning literature on how to improve the effectiveness of control measures targeted at safety professionals. The results suggested that effective management controls involve a fine combination of formal, informal, process and output controls. In practice, this study uncovers the ways in which managers leverage the efforts of safety professionals in achieving safety goals. Particularly, it informs managers that the control configurations, instead of isolated controls, should be executed to motivate safety professionals.

Analysis of Construction Workers’ Safety Behavior Based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Personality Test in a Bridge Construction Project

Mediating Effect of Risk Propensity between Personality Traits and Unsafe Behavioral Intention of Construction Workers

Proactive Personality and Construction Worker Safety Behavior: Safety Self-Efficacy and Team Member Exchange as Mediators and Safety-Specific Transformational Leadership as Moderators

The Influence of Mutual Assistance of Construction Workers with Different Personality Traits on Team Safety

Safety attitudes and safety management: perspectives of managerial personnel and frontline workers in construction sites in China

Personality Factors and Safety Attitudes Predict Safety Behaviour and Accidents in Elevator Workers.

Understanding the Factors and the Corresponding Interactions That Influence Construction Worker Safety Performance from a Competency-Model-Based Perspective: Evidence from Scaffolders in China

The relationship between construction workers' emotional intelligence and safety performance

How personality traits influence management styles of construction project managers

An Experimental Study of Real-Time Identification of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviors

Exploring the intentional unsafe behavior of workers in prefabricated construction based on structural equation modeling

Study and Action Plan on the Key Factors Influencing Unsafe Behaviors by Construction Workers

Group management model for construction workers' unsafe behavior based on cognitive process model

Research on the Coupled Relationship of Factors Influencing Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: A Hybrid DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Approach

Construction Worker Risk-Taking Behavior Model with Individual and Organizational Factors

Analysis of the role of big five personality throuch worker’s safety culture and personal value as intervening variable on construction workers’ safety behavior using SEM-PLS

Relationships between Social Support, Social Status Perception, Social Identity, Work Stress, and Safety Behavior of Construction Site Management Personnel

Grounded Theory and Social Psychology Approach to Investigating the Formation of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviour

How Do Psychological Cognition and Institutional Environment Affect the Unsafe Behavior of Construction Workers?—Research on fsQCA Method

How do different management control configurations influence construction safety professionals' work attitudes