Abstract:Different mathematical models can be developed to represent the dynamic behavior of structural systems and assess properties, such as risk of failure and reliability. Selecting an adequate model requires choosing a model of sufficient complexity to accurately capture the output responses under various operational conditions. However, as model complexity increases, the functional relationship between input parameters varies and the number of parameters required to represent the physical system increases, reducing computational efficiency and increasing modeling difficulty. The process of model selection is further exacerbated by uncertainty introduced from input parameters, noise in experimental measurements, numerical solutions, and model form. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the acceptable level of uncertainty that can be present within numerical models, while reliably capturing the fundamental physics of a subject system. However, before uncertainty quantification can be performed, a sensitivity analysis study is required to prevent numerical ill-conditioning from parameters that contribute insignificant variability to the output response features of interest. The main focus of this paper, therefore, is to employ sensitivity analysis tools on models to remove low sensitivity parameters from the calibration space. The subject system in this study is a modular spring-damper system integrated into a space truss structure. Six different cases of increasing complexity are derived from a mathematical model designed from a two-degree of freedom (2DOF) mass spring-damper that neglects single truss properties, such as geometry and truss member material properties. Model sensitivity analysis is performed using the Analysis of Variation (ANOVA) and the Coefficient of Determination R2. The global sensitivity results for the parameters in each 2DOF case are determined from the R2 calculation and compared in performance to evaluate levels of parameter contribution. Parameters with a weighted R2 value less than .02 account for less than 2% of the variation in the output responses and are removed from the calibration space. This paper concludes with an outlook on implementing Bayesian inference methodologies, delayed-acceptance single-component adaptive Metropolis (DA-SCAM) algorithm and Gaussian Process Models for Simulation Analysis (GPM/SA), to select the most representative mathematical model and set of input parameters that best characterize the system’s dynamic behavior.

A Reliability Model Validation Method For Mitigating The Effects Of Measurement Uncertainty

Model Validation Via Uncertainty Propagation and Data Transformations

A New Validation Metric for Models with Correlated Responses Using Limited Experimental and Simulation Data

Simulation-Based Robust Design of Complex Product Considering Uncertainties of Metamodel, Design Variables, and Noise Parameters

A novel framework for the reliability modelling of repairable multistate complex mechanical systems considering propagation relationships.

Quantitative model validation techniques: New insights

Development and Realization of Validation Benchmarks

Incorporating Numerical Uncertainties for Validation of Nonlinear Models

A non-probabilistic robust reliability method for analysis and design optimization of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters

Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance

AN ENGINEERING RELIABILITY ANALYSIS METHOD BASED ON ADAPTIVE METAMODELS

A NONPROBABILISTIC SET MODEL OF STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY BASED ON SATISFACTION DEGREE OF INTERVAL

Applying Uncertainty Quantification to Structural Systems: Parameter Reduction for Evaluating Model Complexity

Optimal Design of Validation Experiment for Material Deterioration

A Software Reliability Model Considering a Scale Parameter of the Uncertainty and a New Criterion

Optimal Design of Validation Experiments for the Prediction of Quantities of Interest

On the Robust Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities for Strong Nonlinear Models

Advanced Extremum Response Surface Method for Dynamic Reliability Analysis on Flexible Mechanism

An efficient sequential anisotropic RBF reliability analysis method with fast cross-validation and parallelizability

Incorporating uncertainty into the validation of automotive crash simulation models for component analysis