Percutaneous Image-Guided Permanent 125 I Implantation for Treating Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer, 2000-2015

S. Tian,Y. Jiang,J. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2017.04.178
2017-01-01
Abstract:To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous image-guided permanent iodine-125 implantation as salvage therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer from a single institute analysis of the years 2000 to 2015. A total of 154 patients (101 male, 53 female; mean age 53.4 years, range30–74 years) with recurrent head and neck cancer were included in this study. The diagnosis of each case was verified by CT, MRI and biopsy. A median number of 46 125I seeds (rang, 12-86) per patient were implanted into recurrent head and neck cancer by image-guided needle puncture. The specific activity of 125I ranged from 0.55 to 0.80 mCi per seed and the median D90 was 120 Gy (rang, 90-153 Gy). Patients were followed-up by examination and by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to evaluate treatment responses. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. During a median follow-up period was37months (range: 5–74months), the response rate of tumor was 82.6%. Overall median control time was 24.0 months (95% CI, 8.1–39.8). The local control rate was 57.8% at 1 year and 34.5% at 2 years. The overall median survival was 28 months (95% CI, 4.4–35.5), while the overall 1-, 2- year survival rates were 61.9%, 38.1%, respectively. No serious complications were observed postoperatively and during the follow-up period. On univariate analysis, improved local control of recurrent head and neck cancer was associated significantly with favorable stage, tumor volume, D90. On univariate analysis, improved survival was associated significantly with stage, tumor volume, D90. Good performance status. On multivariate analysis, sage, D90 and tumor volume maintained significance for the local control. Among the selected parameters, age and stage appeared significantly correlated with overall survive in multivariate analysis. image-guided brachytherapy using 125I seed implantation was a safe and effective therapeutic technique for treating recurrent head and neck cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?