Abstract:Abstract Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms are successfully applied in many real-world multiobjective optimization problems. As for many other AI methods, the theoretical understanding of these algorithms is lagging far behind their success in practice. In particular, previous theory work considers mostly easy problems that are composed of unimodal objectives. As a first step towards a deeper understanding of how evolutionary algorithms solve multimodal multiobjective problems, we propose the OneJumpZeroJump problem, a bi-objective problem composed of two objectives isomorphic to the classic jump function benchmark. We prove that the simple evolutionary multiobjective optimizer (SEMO) with probability one does not compute the full Pareto front, regardless of the runtime. In contrast, for all problem sizes n and all jump sizes k∈[4..n2-1], the global SEMO (GSEMO) covers the Pareto front in an expected number of Θ((n-2k)nk) iterations. For k=o(n), we also show the tighter bound 32enk+1±o(nk+1), which might be the first runtime bound for an MOEA that is tight apart from lower-order terms. We also combine the GSEMO with two approaches that showed advantages in single-objective multimodal problems. When using the GSEMO with a heavy-tailed mutation operator, the expected runtime improves by a factor of at least kΩ(k). When adapting the recent stagnation-detection strategy of Rajabi and Witt (2022) to the GSEMO, the expected runtime also improves by a factor of at least kΩ(k) and surpasses the heavy-tailed GSEMO by a small polynomial factor in k. Via an experimental analysis, we show that these asymptotic differences are visible already for small problem sizes: A factor-5 speed-up from heavy-tailed mutation and a factor-10 speed-up from stagnation detection can be observed already for jump size 4 and problem sizes between 10 and 50. Overall, our results show that the ideas recently developed to aid single-objective evolutionary algorithms to cope with local optima can be effectively employed also in multiobjective optimization.

Theoretical Analyses of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms on Multi-Modal Objectives

Theoretical Analyses of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms on Multimodal Objectives

An New Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm

A Review of Evolutionary Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization

Runtime Analyses of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms in the Presence of Noise

Large-Scale Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization

A First Runtime Analysis of the NSGA-II on a Multimodal Problem

Near-Tight Runtime Guarantees for Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

A Two-stage Evolutionary Framework For Multi-objective Optimization

Performance Scaling Of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

BiOM: A Framework for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization

Design and Analysis of Diversity-Based Parent Selection Schemes for Speeding Up Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimisation

A Framework to Handle Multi-modal Multi-objective Optimization in Decomposition-based Evolutionary Algorithms

Theoretical Advantage of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms for Problems with Different Degrees of Conflict

A Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Using Two-Archive and Recombination Strategies

A Bi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for Multimodal Multiobjective Optimization

A New Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Many-Objective Optimization Problems

Goal-directed multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithm converging on population derivation

A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based On Decomposition And Probability Model

Adaptive Merging and Coordinated Offspring Generation in Multi-Population Evolutionary Multi-Modal Multi-Objective Optimization

Runtime Analysis of the SMS-EMOA for Many-Objective Optimization