Abstract:The amount of palaeoecological information available continues to grow rapidly, supporting improved descriptions of the dynamics of past ecosystems and enabling them to be seen from new perspectives. At the same time, there has been concern over whether palaeoecological enquiry needs to move beyond descriptive inference to a more hypothesis-focussed, or experimental approach. However, the extent to which conventional hypothesis-driven scientific frameworks can be applied to historical contexts (i.e., the past) is the subject of ongoing debate. In other disciplines concerned with human-environment interactions, including physical geography and archaeology, there has been growing use of generative simulation models, typified by agent-based approaches. Generative modeling encourages counter-factual questioning (“what if…?,”) a mode of argument that is particularly important in systems and time-periods, such as the Holocene, and now the Anthropocene, where the effects of humans and other biophysical processes are deeply intertwined. However, palaeoecologically focused simulation of the dynamics of the ecosystems of the past either seems to be conducted to assess the applicability of some model to the future or treats humans simplistically as external forcing factors. In this review we consider how generative simulation-modeling approaches could contribute to our understanding of past human-environment interactions. We consider two key issues: the need for null models for understanding past dynamics and the need to be able learn more from pattern-based analysis. In this light, we argue that there is considerable scope for palaeoecology to benefit from developments in generative models and their evaluation. We discuss the view that simulation is a form of experiment and by using case studies, consider how the many patterns available to palaeoecologists can support model evaluation in a way that moves beyond simplistic pattern-matching and how such models might also inform us about the data themselves and the processes generating them. Our emphasis is on how generative simulation might complement traditional palaeoecological methods and proxies rather than on a detailed overview of the modeling methods themselves.

Author Response for "ford's Gamma‐gamma Village Simulation Revisited: Highlighting the Need for a New Middle‐Range Theory of Archaeological Types †"

Response to von Schmalensee et al.

Design Space Constraints and the Cultural Taxonomy of European Final Palaeolithic Large Tanged Points: A Comparison of Typological, Landmark-Based and Whole-Outline Geometric Morphometric Approaches

The quantitative assessment of archaeological artifact groups: Beyond geometric morphometrics

Tafoni and laboratory‐based experiments of historical contingent phenomenon

Author Response for "phylogenetic and Functional Clustering Illustrate the Roles of Adaptive Radiation and Dispersal Filtering in Jointly Shaping Late‐quaternary Mammal Assemblages on Oceanic Islands"

Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point?

Re-considering Processual and Post-Processual Archaeology: Can a Historical Approach Help Nuance the Usage of aDNA and Archaeogenetics

Experimental Simulation: Using Generative Modeling and Palaeoecological Data to Understand Human-Environment Interactions

The Role of Theory in Behavior Analysis: A Response to Unfinished Business, Travis Thompson's Review of Staddon's New Behaviorism (2nd edition)

Replies to commentaries on beyond playing 20 questions with nature

The Relationship of Building Types and Plots to Changing Family Structures and Land Systems in Chinese Settlements

Ambiguous landscapes: A framework for assessing robustness and uncertainties in archaeological point pattern analysis

Rejoinder of: Statistical analysis of an archeological find

On the relation between structural diversity and geographical distance among languages: observations and computer simulations

Was Thebes Necessary? Contingency in Spatial Modeling

The Past, Present, and Future of Typological Databases in NLP

The response to and rejection of Brian Ford's Too Big to Walk, a 21st century effort to reinstate the aquatic dinosaur hypothesis

Niche Construction Theory in Archaeology: A Critical Review

“All that glitters is not gold”: Evaluating the Nature of the Relationship Between Archeological Residues and Stone Tool Function

Where the Model Frequently Meets the Road: Combining Statistical, Formal, and Case Study Methods