Comment On "Seasonal And Nodal Variations Of Predominant Tidal Constituents In The Global Ocean" By Cao Et Al. (2021) In Continental Shelf Research 217

Zhiyun Du,Qian Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104524

IF: 2.629

2021-01-01

Continental Shelf Research

Abstract:Cao et al. (2021) report their discovery of invariant M-2 seasonal signals and argue that a superposition of the astronomical tides M-2, H-1 and H-2 is responsible for seasonal M-2 variations described in previous studies. Accordingly, other possible mechanisms such as seasonal stratification (e.g., Muller et al., 2014) may be unconvincing. However, the amplitudes of astronomical H-1 and H-2 constituents are only 0.33% and 0.31% of the M-2 component, respectively, as is indicated by the theory of equilibrium tide, suggesting trivial contributions (similar to 0.64%) to the seasonal M-2 variations. Here, adopting a 30-day time window in harmonic analysis of the record from six tide gauges, we identified a noticeable M-2 modulation, i.e., >1.7% over a period of around 12 months. We also used a two-year time window, as suggested by Cao et al. (2021), but found that the ratios of the H-1 and H-2 amplitudes to the M-2 component are much larger than the theoretical values, indicating the "H-1 and H-2 tides" obtained in this manner are not of astronomical origin. Thus, we suggest that their proposed mechanism about seasonal M-2 variation is erroneous for the areas where exists noticeable M-2 modulation; instead, the mechanisms (i.e., seasonal stratification and sea-ice friction) they denied provide a better interpretation in terms of the physics of the tide.