Abstract:In this paper, a sparse learning algorithm, probabilistic classification vector machines (PCVMs), is proposed. We analyze relevance vector machines (RVMs) for classification problems and observe that adopting the same prior for different classes may lead to unstable solutions. In order to tackle this problem, a signed and truncated Gaussian prior is adopted over every weight in PCVMs, where the sign of prior is determined by the class label, i.e., +1 or -1. The truncated Gaussian prior not only restricts the sign of weights but also leads to a sparse estimation of weight vectors, and thus controls the complexity of the model. In PCVMs, the kernel parameters can be optimized simultaneously within the training algorithm. The performance of PCVMs is extensively evaluated on four synthetic data sets and 13 benchmark data sets using three performance metrics, error rate (ERR), area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUC), and root mean squared error (RMSE). We compare PCVMs with soft-margin support vector machines (SVM(Soft)), hard-margin support vector machines (SVM(Hard)), SVM with the kernel parameters optimized by PCVMs (SVM(PCVM)), relevance vector machines (RVMs), and some other baseline classifiers. Through five replications of twofold cross-validation F test, i.e., 5 x 2 cross-validation F test, over single data sets and Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc test to compare these algorithms over multiple data sets, we notice that PCVMs outperform other algorithms, including SVM(Soft), SVM(Hard), RVM, and SVM(PCVM), on most of the data sets under the three metrics, especially under AUC. Our results also reveal that the performance of SVM(PCVM) is slightly better than SVM(Soft), implying that the parameter optimization algorithm in PCVMs is better than cross validation in terms of performance and computational complexity. In this paper, we also discuss the superiority of PCVMs' formulation using maximum a posteriori (MAP) analysis and margin analysis, which explain the empirical success of PCVMs.

Comparative Analysis For Probability Modeling Of Multi-Class Svm

A Novel Svm Modeling Approach For Highly Imbalanced And Overlapping Classification

Novel One-Vs-rest Classifier Based on SVM and Multi-Spheres

Support Vector Machines Ensemble With Optimizing Weights By Genetic Algorithm

A Multi-Class Large Margin Classifier

Probability Output of Multi-Class Support Vector Machines

Probability output modeling for support vector machines

One-Class Support Vector Machine with Relative Comparisons

Weighted Posterior Probability Output for Support Vector Machines

One-against-all Multi-Class SVM Classification Using Reliability Measures

Performance Analysis and Comparison of Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines Classifier

Research and Analysis of Methods for Multiclass Support Vector Machines

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine for Multi-Class Classification

Multi-Classification using One-versus-One Deep Learning Strategy with Joint Probability Estimates

An Improved Multiclass Algorithm For Svms

Multiclass Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine

Multi-sphere Classification Algorithm Based on 1-SVM

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machines.

Within-class Penalty Based Multi-Class Support Vector Machine.

Twin SVM for conditional probability estimation in binary and multiclass classification

A multiclass classification using one-versus-all approach with the differential partition sampling ensemble