Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

Participation Of China'S Think Tanks In The Policy Process: Roles, Strategies And Behaviors

The Social Functions of China’s Think Tanks

Government Advisors or Public Advocates? Roles of Think Tanks in China from the Perspective of Regional Variations

Chinese Think Tanks and Public Diplomacy in the Xi Jinping Era

The Influence Of Think Tanks In The Chinese Policy Process Different Ways And Mechanisms

Think tanks in transitional China

The media and think tanks in China: The construction and propagation of a think tank

China’s ‘New-Type’ Private Think Tanks: Is ‘New’ Better?

Dynamics of the Rise of the Privately-Run and Government-Subsidised Think Tank and Its Influence in Talent Policy Making-Case Study of the Zhejiang Institution of Talent Development

China's Economic Think Tanks: Their Changing Role in the 1990S

A Study of Social Think Tanks in China: Dilemma, Trends and Breakthroughs

Embracing Scientific Decision Making: The Rise of Think-Tank Policies in China

China’s Think Tank Building：Three Aspects with International Comparison

Study On Exchange Relationship Between Government And Non-Governmental Organization

Understanding the Development of Think Tanks in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Three Perspectives to Understand Public Policy Process and their Implications for China Study

Think Tanks in Politically Embedded Knowledge Regimes: Does the “revolving Door” Matter in China?

Development status and countermeasures of China's science and technology think tank

Media Think Tanks：Getting the Public Involved in Sharing Intellectual Products

"The Fifth Power"——American Think Tanks and the US China Policy