The U.S. 1851 3¢ Stamp: Color, Chemistry, and Changes
J. A. Allen,Thomas M. Lera
Abstract:This paper describes research performed on the United States 3¢ 1851 stamp (Scott USA numbers 10, 10A, 11, and 11A) both to determine analytically the elemental composition of their printing inks and to demonstrate quantitative measures of their color with stateoftheart technology. The principal analytical tools for performing these analyses were Xray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) and optical reflectance spectroscopy. A relatively simple technique for determining significant elements in the ink pigment is presented based on XRF analysis. The resulting elemental data are then correlated with documented chemical formulae and visual properties of pigments and inks of the period. This correlation allows the likely and predominant pigments used in the manufacture of the inks to be inferred. From this, a general approach for the evaluation of ink colors in terms of likely pigments is offered. The use of rigorous scientific analyses led to results that challenge longheld historical beliefs about particular inks used for these stamps. The results were surprising and not predictable. The older hypotheses, while posited using a technical approach, did not have access to the types of analytical tools available today. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The United States 1851 3¢ stamp is an important and popular philatelic collectible. It has been the subject of significant research for a long period of time. The stamps are distinguished for collecting purposes by the characteristic positions of the specific plate from which they were produced. Furthermore, over 1 billion stamps were produced during a 10year period from 28 original or modified plates. This resulted in many plate varieties and color shades (Granzow, 2004:268). The specific colors of the stamps, a subject of much specialization, can often be associated with the plate used, the year of production, or both. The year of production is deduced from dates found on postal usages and through the years agreed upon by specialists studying these stamps. However, almost no scientific work has been done in the area of inks, pigments, and the resulting colors. Nonetheless, speculation and hypotheses have abounded and have become part of the documented philatelic history of the stamp. What follows is the history of what was believed concerning the colors and their origins for the subject stamp prior to the work recorded in this paper being done. This work was done to explore the elemental content of the stamps of the period with no preconceptions influencing the selection of the tools or the plan of the experiments or the possible outcomes. Nor was there any preconception about what would be discovered. In Chase’s (1942:154–158) landmark book on the 3¢ stamp of the 1851–1857 period, he described in some detail the various colors of the stamps by year. The sequence James A. Allen, 4608 Oakridge Drive, Midland, MI, 486401914, USA. Thomas Lera, National Postal Museum, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, MRC 570, Washington, D.C., 200137012, USA. Correspondence: stampmole@ sbcglobal.net. Manuscript received 10 April 2013; accepted 26 April 2013. 7 2 • S M I T H S O N I A N C O N T R I B U T I O N S T O H I S T O RY A N D T E C H N O L O G Y discussed by Chase, the one we will follow covering the first two years or so, begins with the orangebrown stamps, then the brownishcarmine stamps, followed by the dull red stamps. Chase then proceeds to hypothesize how these colors were compounded or created. Chase eliminated most dyes and lakes based on observed stamp colors, commonly known printing practices, and pigment availability at the time of the 1851 stamp production. This was a very logical and thoughtful assessment of the options for color generation of the time. The authors followed a similar approach in their analysis but with much more access to historical information. Chase then described experiments used to determine the primary pigment as Venetian red (an iron oxide–derived pigment, Fe2O3) augmented with vermilion (mercuric sulfide, HgS) to obtain a very rich, more orange color. Figure 1 illustrates an example of the orangebrown stamp used on a firstday cover dated 1 July 1851. He also commented the pigments used were, for the most part, resistant to sunlight. He speculated the stamp pigment was approximately 80% Venetian red and 20% vermilion based on experiments using color matching with selected contemporaneous pigments. He further commented on the pigment sensitivity to atmospheric sulfur dioxide. Occasionally, this pollutant caused darkening of the stamps, which he noted could be remedied by treatment with hydrogen peroxide, H2O2. Chase continued, saying the next “serious” color was brownish carmine. This is the most common color produced in 1852, although it first appeared in the late fall 1851. Chase went on to say it was probably a very good quality Venetian red without admixture of the vermilion as was done in the early orangebrown pigmented stamps (Chase, 1942:156). Indeed, today this color would approximate the artist color known as Venetian red. Figure 2 shows the earliest documented example (22 October 1851) of the brownishcarmine color. Chase continued, observing that soon after January 1853, another major color change occurred. The ink, he stated, “was somewhat suggestive of the original orange brown color, though the color is duller and impressions are never very clear” (Chase, 1942:156). Figure 3 shows an example of the dull red–colored stamp from the author’s collection that was tested during the current research. Chase stated the pigment was Venetian red, though perhaps with less vermilion (Chase, 1942:156). This is his last mention of ink pigments for the stamps. Those pigments, Venetian red, or similar iron oxide–based pigments, with or without vermilion (mercuric sulfide, HgS), were deemed the component bases of the remainder of the colors of the series. Nothing was later added about ink composition versus perceived color versus years of use, except for a relatively standardized naming nomenclature per color per year range. PosT1942 color eXPloraTions unTil now Since the time of Chase’s book publication in 1942, almost no technical work, much less scientific work, has been performed on the 3¢ 1851–1861 stamps. The only notable exception has been very critical visual comparisons, categorizations, and FiguRe 1. Orangebrown color (Scott 10A) firstday cover, 1 July 1851. Courtesy of the author. N U M B E R 5 7 • 7 3 naming of the 3¢ colors (Amonette, 1973; Beals, 1974; Amonette and Hulme, 2005). These works have become the basis of color standardization and naming in this area of specialization. The subject stamp was produced and used from July 1851 to the fall of 1861. As mentioned earlier, the 3¢ stamps were produced in many distinctive or slightly different colors, hues, and shades. However, it should be noted the term used to describe the color of this stamp by the Post Office Department was simply “red.” This fact is documented in correspondence from the Post Office Department to the stamp contractor, Toppan, Carpenter & Co. (Toppan, Carpenter & Co., 1851). color diFFerenTiaTion and naming Color identification and matching have been done for the 1851 3¢ stamps for over 70 years. Starting with Chase’s (1942) work, specialists have continued to study the colors. This has included Card (1964), Amonette (1973), Beals (1974), Amonette and Hulme (2005:103–109), and James Allen. Significant collections of these stamps, starting with those of Chase, have been retained and extended by today’s specialists. Through the years, additional stamps would be sent to all of the experts on this issue for identification. The colors were then agreed to by these experts, thus becoming a de facto standard. Standard color charts were then prepared using actual stamps. These charts can be used to perform color matching on unknown samples. ink FormulaTion in The midnineTeenTh cenTury During the period 1851–1861, based on actual practice, oilbased inks for banknotes, paper, and stamp production were fairly similar in composition and manufacture.1 The banknote inks were usually black and carbon based. Beyond the midnineteenth century, 1856 in the case of Toppan, Carpenter & FiguRe 2. Earliest known use, 22 October 1851, for brownishcarmine color (Scott 11A) (Plate 1 late). Courtesy of the author. FiguRe 3. Dull red color (Scott 11A) identified by Chase (1942). Courtesy of the author. 7 4 • S M I T H S O N I A N C O N T R I B U T I O N S T O H I S T O RY A N D T E C H N O L O G Y Co., color began to be used more. The inks were composed of a liquid vehicle that was combined with the dry pigment portion of the ink.2 The liquid portion consisted primarily of linseed oil, often a blend of viscosities. It might also include a higher heat treated, slightly oxidized oil component called a varnish to modify viscosity and aid in adhesion. Finally, other ingredients were often included: a drying agent, a very volatile hydrocarbon to facilitate mixing and wetting of the pigments, a wax to modify flow properties, and a few other proprietary ingredients. The actual solvent recipes are rarely found or are nonexistent. Pigment recipes for early stamps are rare and proprietary. That was all part of the craft at the time. Vehicle properties were tailored to the needs of the final ink properties desired and the specific incorporated solids. Attention was paid to the ability to mix the ground pigments thoroughly into the vehicle. These were, by nature, complex mixtures that required recipes and significant knowledge and skill of the ink maker. Inks for the banknotes were compounded “in house” most of the time and were modified as needed during production. Carbonbased black inks could be purchased premixed depending on the nature of the ink and printing desired. Colored inks, however, often required mixing on site for technical reasons. The ink recipe formulations, including the pigments used, were ofte