Efficacy And Safety Of Subcutaneous Bortezomib Versus Intravenous Bortezomib In Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Shilong Zhang,Jing Li,Peng Liu
2018-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) bortezomib versus intravenous (IV) bortezomib in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed from databases including the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (CBM) and Wan Fang Database. Odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by RevMan 5.3. Subgroup analysis and publication bias were also conducted. Results: The meta-analysis included seven randomized controlled trials and six retrospective cohort studies, altogether involving 1,198 patients. Patients in SC administration group had lower risk of peripheral neuropathy (PN), both all grades (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.59, P < 0.001) and 3-4 grades (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.82, P < 0.001). Complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) had no significant differences between the two groups (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.10, P = 0.17; OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.07, P = 0.14, respectively). Conclusion: The efficacy of SC bortezomib was similar to IV bortezomib for MM patients and has a significant improved safety profile.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?