Abstract:The most common beneficiation method for feldspar is flotation with a cationic (amine) collector under acidic conditions. However, there are several disadvantages to this, such as environmental pollution and equipment corrosion. In order to resolve such problems, it is important to study the flotation of feldspar using anionic collectors under natural pH conditions. The purpose of this paper is to study the effects and mechanism of Fe3+ on flotation separation of feldspar and epidote using sodium oleate (NaOL) at a natural pH. Through flotation experiments, adsorption measurements, zeta potential testing, FTIR analysis and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the mechanism of Fe3+ on the surface of feldspar and epidote is revealed, and the reason behind the difference in flotation of the two minerals is discussed. The flotation test results show that Fe3+ can significantly improve the flotation behavior of minerals when NaOL is used as a collector under natural pH, and the highest recovery rates of feldspar and epidote are 90% and 43%, respectively. Analysis of the solution and adsorption measurement results show that Fe3+ is adsorbed on the minerals′ surface in the form of Fe(OH)3, which promotes the adsorption of NaOL on the minerals’ surface through Fe(OH)3, activating the flotation of feldspar and epidote. The difference in adsorption of Fe3+ between feldspar and epidote is the reason for this difference in flotation behavior. The results of the zeta potentials show that after being treated with Fe3+, the electrostatic adsorption of NaOL displays a significant negative shift on the surface of feldspar, while there is almost no electrostatic adsorption of NaOL on the surface of Fe3+-treated epidote. FTIR analysis confirmed that the difference in the adsorption of Fe3+ and NaOL on the surface of feldspar and epidote is due to the fact that there are more active particles (metal bonds) on the surface of feldspar than on the surface of epidote, and the properties of these metal bonds can be changed by Fe3+, which allows NaOL to be more easily adsorbed on the mineral surface through –COO−. The possible adsorption form is “mineral-Fe3+–COO−“. Compared with the infrared spectrum of epidote, there is a new absorption peak at 1713.68 cm−1, which can be attributed to the C=O characteristic peak of NaOL in the infrared spectrum of Fe3+–NaOL-treated feldspar, which is why the floatability of feldspar is better than epidote. XPS confirmed that the Fe on the surface of feldspar is Fe3+ in the form of Fe(OH)3, while Fe on the surface of epidote is mainly Fe2O3 (Fe–O) contained in mineral crystals. Furthermore, there is less adsorption of Fe3+ on the surface of epidote, and this discrepancy leads to the difference in the adsorption of NaOL on the minerals’ surface, which itself leads to the difference in flotation behavior between feldspar and epidote. These findings indicate that the flotation separation of feldspar and epidote can be achieved using Fe3+ and NaOL under natural pH. This study may provide a reference for the flotation mechanism of feldspar and epidote under natural pH.

Relationship Between Flotation and Fe/Mn Ratio of Wolframite with Benzohydroxamic Acid and Sodium Oleate As Collectors

Original Data and Descriptions from Inhibition Mechanism of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ in Fine Cassiterite Flotation Using Octanohydroxamic Acid

Effect of Grinding Media on the Flotation Behavior of Fluorite Using Sodium Oleate As a Collector

Study on the role of a hydroxamic acid derivative in wolframite flotation: Selective separation and adsorption mechanism

Flotation assessment and adsorption mechanism of wulfenite with three anionic collectors

Design and selection of flotation collectors for zinc oxide minerals based on bond valence model

New insights into separating wolframite from calcium bearing minerals by flotation

A quantitative innovation perspective on synergism and selectivity mechanism of mixed collectors in flotation

Molecular design of multiple ligand metal–organic framework (ML-MOF) collectors for efficient flotation separation of minerals

Inhibition Mechanism of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Fe3+ in Fine Cassiterite Flotation Using Octanohydroxamic Acid

Role of improving molybdenite flotation by using aromatic hydrocarbon collector in high-calcium water: A multiscale investigation

Surface Mechanism of Fe3+ Ions on the Improvement of Fine Monazite Flotation With Octyl Hydroxamate as the Collector

Effect of Fe2+ on low rank coal flotation using oleic acid as collector

Synergistic Effect of Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate on Flotation Separation of Magnesite and Dolomite with Sodium Oleate Collector

Application and Mechanism of Mixed Anionic/Cationic Collectors on Reverse Flotation of Hematite

Flotation behavior of oleate and dodecylamine as mixed collector for recovery of lithium and rubidium from low-grade spodumene tailings: Experiment, characterization and DFT calculation

Separation of wolframite ore by froth flotation using a novel “crab” structure sebacoyl hydroxamic acid collector without Pb(NO3)2 activation

Structural modification of hydroxamic acid collectors to enhance the flotation performance of malachite and associated mechanism

Effects and Mechanism of Fe3+ on Flotation Separation of Feldspar and Epidote with Sodium Oleate at Natural pH

Study on the flotation separation mechanism of diaspore from kaolinite using mixed NaOL/BHA collector

Comparison of the Effects of Sodium Oleate and Benzohydroxamic Acid on Fine Scheelite and Cassiterite Hydrophobic Flocculation