Reply to Forster Et Al.: Quantifying Demic Movement and Local Recruitment in the Spread of Horse Domestication

Vera Warmuth,Graeme Barker,Mim Ann Bower,Bryan Kent Hanks,Shuicheng Li,David Lomitashvili,Maria Ochir-Goryaeva,Grigory V. Sizonov,Vasiliy Soyonov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212046109

2012-01-01

Abstract:Quantifying demic movement and local recruitment in the spread of horse domesticationForster et al. (1) claim that we (2) have misrepresented their publication "Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse" (3).In our introduction we state ". .., the multiple-origins scenario is commonly invoked to account for the large number of female lineages in the domestic horse gene pool, citing the paper by Jansen et al (reference 6 in our paper) among others.We maintain that we cite the paper by Jansen et al. correctly, because i) it shows that domestic horses retain a large number of female lineages and ii) it is frequently cited as supporting a multiple domestication scenario.For example, "It [the horse] is thought to have been domesticated on numerous independent occasions. ..(3, . .., . ..)" (4)."A pattern (. ..) of multiple domestication events has been proposed for horses (3). . .." (5)."The history of horse domestication has been investigated largely from mitochondrial and Y chromosome sequences (. ..).Multiple domestication events have been suggested to occur (. . .3)" (6).Indeed, Jansen et al themselves state, ". ..Assuming our interpretation of multiple genetic horse origins is correct, etc."Although we acknowledge that, in their discussion, Jansen et al. speculate on a domestication scenario similar to the one recovered by our quantitative model, it was beyond the scope of our article to review the countless scenarios of the origin and spread of horse domestication that have been hypothesized in the past, especially since none of them were sufficiently supported by data.