A Comparison Of The Clinical Characteristics And Prognosis Between Cirrhotic And Non-Cirrhotic Portal Vein Thrombosis

Bo Gao,Jiangqiang Xiao,Ming Zhang,Feng Zhang,Jian Yang,Jian He,Yu Liu,Yuzheng Zhuge,Ping Xu
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) can develop in both cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis patients. However, little is known about how these two categories of patients are different or how they are connected. This study was designed to identify the different characteristics and prognoses between non-malignant cirrhotic PVT and non-cirrhotic PVT. Methods: The retrospective study recruited 142 non-malignant cirrhotic PVT and 43 non-cirrhotic PVT patients from May 2012 to December 2017. Their clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, complications, and survival rates were compared. The subgroup analysis was stratified according to the degree of thrombus. Results: Coagulation, liver function, and the inflammatory parameters were significantly different between the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic PVT groups. The degrees of ascites (P < 0.001) and varices (P < 0.001) in the cirrhotic patients were significantly more severe. The incidence of cavernoma was significantly higher (41.9 vs. 12.7, P < 0.001) in the non-cirrhotic group. Patients with cavernoma had higher splenectomy histories in both groups (cirrhotic: 50%, non-cirrhotic: 38.9%). Sixteen patients (13.3%) died in the cirrhotic group, but all the patients survived during the follow up period in the non-cirrhotic group. The difference in survival rates was statistically significant, with P = 0.014. Conclusions: The degrees of ascites, varices, and thrombus between PVT in non-malignant cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis were significantly different. Patients with PVT in the non-cirrhotic group showed a relatively optimistic prognosis. The patients with cavernoma had higher splenectomy history rates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?