Abstract:Background: The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was introduced in China in 2013 as one of the most important electronic health literacy measurement instruments. After a decade of development in China, it has received widespread attention, although its theoretical underpinnings have been challenged, thus demanding more robust research evidence of factorial validity and multigroup measurement properties. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the Chinese version of the eHEALS in terms of its measurement properties. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in a university setting in China. Item statistics were checked for response distributions and floor and ceiling effects. Internal consistency reliability was confirmed with Cronbach α, split-half reliability, Cronbach α if an item was deleted, and item-total correlation. A total of 5 representative eHEALS factor structures were examined and contrasted using confirmatory factor analysis. The study used the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and the average of the I-CVI scores of all items on the scale to assess the content validity of the dominance model. Furthermore, the validated dominance model was subsequently used to evaluate the relevance and representation of elements in the instrument and to assess measurement invariance across genders. Results: A total of 972 respondents were identified, with a Cronbach α of .92, split-half reliability of 0.88, and item-total score correlation coefficients ranging from 0.715 to 0.781. Cronbach α if an item was deleted showed that all items should be retained. Acceptable content validity was supported by I-CVIs ≥0.80. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the 3-factor model was acceptable. The measurement model met all relevant fit indices: average variance extracted from 0.663 to 0.680, composite reliability from 0.810 to 0.857, chi-square divided by the df of 4.768, root mean square error of approximation of 0.062, standardized root mean squared residual of 0.020, comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.987, and Tucker-Lewis index of 0.979. In addition, the scale demonstrated error variance invariance (Δnormed fit index=-0.016, Δincremental fit index=-0.012, ΔTucker-Lewis index=0.005, Δcomparative fit index=-0.012, Δrelative fit index=0.005, and Δroot mean square error of approximation=0.005). Conclusions: A 3-factor model of the Chinese version of the eHEALS fits best, and our findings provide evidence for the strict measurement invariance of the instrument regarding gender.

Validating The Use Of Translated And Adapted Heighten (R) Quantitative Literacy Test In Russia

Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking: Validating the Russian HEIghten® Critical Thinking Assessment

Assessing college critical thinking: preliminary results from the Chinese HEIghten® Critical Thinking assessment

Adaptation of HLS-EU-Q47 for the Russian population

Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance Testing of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Undergraduates: Cross-Sectional Study

Adaptation of the Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS19-Q) for Russian-Speaking Populations—International Collaboration across Germany, Israel, Kazakhstan, Russia, and the USA

Development and Validation of A Computer Adaptive Efl Test

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chinese version of the HLS-EU-Q47

Validation of the digital health literacy assessment among the university students in China

Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults

Quantitative Literacy at Michigan State University, 1: Development and Initial Evaluation of the Assessment

The Past, Present, and Possible Future of the Russian Education Assessment System

Cross-Cultural Validation of the High Blood Pressure Health Literacy Scale in a Chinese Community

Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study

Measuring Functional, Interactive and Critical Health Literacy of Chinese Secondary School Students: Reliable, Valid and Feasible?

Cultural and translation challenges in assessing health literacy among immigrants from the former Soviet Union

Investigating digital skills among Russian higher education students

Measuring Health Literacy in Romania: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q16 Survey Questionnaire

Translanguaging in English Language Teaching: Perceptions of Teachers and Students

Development and validation of an instrument for assessing scientific literacy from junior to senior high school